>it might -- a newer fdisk might also be appropriate, I don't know what
>partition type 'f' is, and neither does your fdisk.
yeah, fdisk v 2.8 w/redhat 5.2 (at least)
>If it's a "windows extended" didn't this list cover that a few months ago?
>Is this list archived, and could someone point Feiste to the archive?
as simon pointed out, it is.
the archive of this list (
http://www.mail-archive.com/siglinux@locutus.csres.utexas.edu
) contains the sum knowledge of this group on this subject.
short answer: 98 fucked you by using a pointless proprietary (read: yet
to be reverse engineered) extended partition format.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
