On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, Simon Hill wrote: >Well, as I said before, I manage a number of mailing lists, and haven't had any >problems. I have had problems without reply-to. It's not quite so easy as the >article claims. The choice between reply-to sender, and reply-to all does NOT >leave me with a choice to reply JUST to the list. Also, frequently, the list >name is not in the To: list, but in the Cc: list. Anyway, I find that there is >no way to reply to the list ONLY, without either typing it in, or otherwise >editing the list of recipients. Just my opinion. Perhaps I'll create a >"reply-to-not-harmful" reubuttal page so that people can just post a link to it >rather than thinking about it, forming their own opinions, and having a >discussion. Well, is it really sensible to reply only to the list? What happens where the sender ISN'T on the list? As a matter of course, I always include the sender in the reply recipients. Also, if your mailer doesn't put Cc:'d recipients in when you say Reply to All, you have a broken mailer. I'd *much* prefer to produce duplicates than leave someone out. Taral --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
