no, no one should ever need more than 128k of mem.
just kidding, typo it was.
Mengmeng Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, tom carlile wrote:
>
> > i have 128k real, and i think 256 swap, but i NEVER touch my swap.
> > i have literally never seen anything use a meg of swap.
>
> Er... you mean 128MB, right? =) I actually have 256MB real and around
> 250MB swap, and I remember all of it being used when I was doing something
> weird once upon a time... Don't remember what exactly. Hrm... what was I
> doing that was taking up that memory? *sigh* Can't remember... Maybe
> compiling something really big? (Mozilla comes to mind...) Whatever...
> I know it didn't crash when the memory ran out though... It just cleared
> the memory it was using and started over. *shrug*
>
> MZhang
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Tom Carlile [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"If you want an application to be portable, you don't necessarily create an
abstraction layer like a microkernel so much as you program intelligently."
-- Linus Torvalds on Microkernels
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
