Oh, I did the custom install. I guess I didn't see that the inetd stuff
was unselected by default (which is still unnerving).
namaste,
Mark
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Don Duck Harper wrote:
> Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 16:58:37 -0500
> From: Don Duck Harper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Mark Hattarki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: SIGLinux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: redhat 6.2
>
> When you do a workstation install, it does not run any daemons but
> sendmail. Just got get the rpm's you need and install them.
>
> Don
>
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2000 at 03:48:59PM -0500, Mark Hattarki wrote to To SIGLinux:
> :-)
> :-) Ok, I did a fresh install of 6.2 last night. To make a long story short,
> :-) there is no inetd.conf file. inetd is not running...
> :-)
> :-) Since Red Hat has taken liberties with the tree structure in the past, my
> :-) suspision is that they descided to muck around with inetd, rename it or
> :-) something (inet doesn't appear to be installed anywhere). The other option
> :-) is that the installer is broken. But, there are no patches on redhat.com
> :-) for this...
> :-)
> :-) Anyway, I just want to confirm that red hat changed this and it's not a
> :-) bug or anything. If they did, it is the anvil that broke the camels back.
> :-) I will install debain or suse at that point.
> :-)
> :-) namaste,
> :-) Mark
> :-)
> :-) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> :-) Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> Don Harper, RHCE, MCSE home email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Just a systems kinda guy... home http://www.duckland.org
> work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mpv.com +01-512-795-0015x101
>
> You know you're drinking too much coffee when...
> * You sleep with your eyes open.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
