On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 02:24:49PM -0500, Wei-shi Tsai wrote : | No, I don't need SSH (too slow), I need implicit SSL.
I wouldn't expect ssh to be slower than ssl. ssl is pretty slow/cpu intensive too, you know :) `ssh -c blowfish' can greatly speed up ssh, especially on slow machines. sftp is actually pretty slick. I've personally found scp to be just fine, but if you want something that works like ftp, sftp works just fine. And since most *nix hosts have ssh installed already (and since more and more have OpenSSH and therefore ssh2), it'll already work on most hosts out there. Of course, if you don't control the server, and especially if it's a Windows box that you don't control, you're stuck with what it supports. In that case, good luck on your search -- I can't help you. | Daniel Brown wrote: | > tried sftp? it comes in the openss(h|l) stuff | > | > it actually connects to sshd on port 22. useful idea | > | > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:55:11PM -0500, Wei-shi Tsai wrote: | > | >>Hey everyone, | >> | >>I need to locate a FTP client that supports the use of implicit SSL. It | >>obviously need to be for Linux, and I would like something that is | >>command line driven. I've tried lftp, but the documentation is cryptic | >>so I can't quite figure out how to use it. Any recommendations? -- Doug McLaren, [EMAIL PROTECTED] I can't understand why people are frightened of new ideas. I'm frightened of the old ones. -- John Cage _______________________________________________ Siglinux mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.utacm.org/mailman/listinfo/siglinux
