On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 08:12:06AM -0700, Doc Shipley wrote: > On Wed, 2003-06-18 at 07:12, Victor Pelt wrote: > > after having looked at a dozen different mailers, i havn't found one > > which didn't have (at least) these features > > "mailx" doesn't have any buttons at all. :) while you have him on the buttons issue, it supports both reply-to-all and reply-to-sender features (R vs r), which was what he *meant*. pine handles it too. as do every mailreader i've ever used (and remember, i started out on mailx, which is probably the most primitive mailreader that any of us will ever use, outside of something-that-runs-on-your-cellphone. any opinions from that crowd?) i was a mailx user for over 6 years before i finally decided to install mutt for myself on my main mailreading machine...
> I do actually end up using mailx occasionally, and not by choice. it's not all THAT bad. there's only about 30 command keys to learn, but you only need about 3. > Even Pine is less-than-trivial in this regard. it is? what's nontrivial about "reply to all recipients?" that it prompts you with if you ever try to reply to a mail that has a sender and a to: address that aren't you? granted i never ever use pine so i may be misremembering from my tech support days, please forgive me if so (and some pine user please post correct info =)) _______________________________________________ Siglinux mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.utacm.org/mailman/listinfo/siglinux
