Well, that's *two* votes, right there. :^)
Doc
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Siglinux] sshd and the display variable
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 19:15:17 -0500
From: Daniel Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Doc Shipley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 05:02:22PM -0500, Doc Shipley wrote:
Daniel Brown wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 04:39:10PM -0500, Doc Shipley wrote:
>
>> And when do we get to fix the damned reply-to? Please delete my >>address from the To: lines of any replies.
>
>
>Take it up with jstrunk. If he's still controlling the list and is still >against
>the idea, some sort of convincing will be necessary; otherwise, we can >just take
>a vote.
As I remember the last time it came up, NOBODY who was in favor of the current method is still active on the list.
Show of hands?
Who'd like to see replies go automatically to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Who wants to see replies continue to point at the sender?
Since I have to manually edit the To: and Cc: headers anytime I reply to this list, I vote for the change. I want replies to go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
danb
_______________________________________________ Siglinux mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://machito.utacm.org/mailman/listinfo/siglinux
