Hi! I agree. We've recently merged some fixes that remedy compile issues on modern systems. I have a few PRs in my queue to test & review, but honestly I agree we could make a service release now and perhaps set up some semi-regular release cadence, even if it is a few features/fixes here and there.
Soeren, how do you feel about it? I'm not sure how difficult the release process is, but I can grab the documentation and see if I can make it work, at least testing all the processes. I'm mostly worried about building installer packages, in my experience that always breaks if there hasn't been a release for a long time. In this case, I would suggest to release a version and build the installers after the fact if possible. Regards, Ladislav On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 03:20:00PM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > Hi! > > I noticed that the sigrok and pulseview versions in Debian are > horribly outdated. While the AppImage files work, I'd love to see a > somewhat current version show up in Debian. As it seems, the main > issue is that there are no recent releases in > https://sigrok.org/download/source/pulseview (latest release tarball > is nearly six years old) or > http://sigrok.org/download/source/sigrok-cli (nearly five years old). > > Guess it wouldn't hurt too much dropping a release tarball every now > and then? > > Thanks, > Jan-Benedict > PS: Just used it to snoop on a traditional 50pin 8bit narrow SCSI-2 > single-ended bus, that worked perfectly well using the AppImage stuff. > > -- > _______________________________________________ > sigrok-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel -- S pozdravem Ladislav "Krakonoš" Láska http://www.krakonos.org/ _______________________________________________ sigrok-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sigrok-devel
