I think that Neil hits the nail on the head.

>From my experience a business person should definitely listen what
lawyers and accountants tell, but doesn't allow them to make final
decisions. 

I am generalizing, but lawyers and accountant tend to be too
risk-averse. For example, for many of them it is easier to say 'no'
than to find a legally viable way to work an issue around.



-- 
Best regards,
Alexander Levashov
Altima Interactive - custom web development
www.altima.net.au

email: [email protected]

Friday, June 24, 2011, 8:04:31 PM, you wrote:

> Whilst compliance with the law is important, the reality is that the
> law is not necessarily black or white. It is the shading that creates
> the variety of opinions and arguments that occur resulting in
> litigation.

> I would personally argue that sound commercial advice, clearly linked
> to ensuring that a venture develops and executes appropriate strategic
> options for commercial success, is more important. Just because an
> individual is a great lawyer or accountant does not automatically
> translate to them being great at business.

> Strategic advisory boards, or boards of directors are one such way of
> providing this support to a business. Individual mentors are another.
> Identify individuals with knowledge in your field, who may be able to
> assist. You may be surprised how willing people are to provide
> support.

> Often a great starting point are chambers of commerce, industry peak
> bodies, or indeed by asking others in your network.


> On Jun 24, 7:45 pm, Ben Sand <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I'm coming to realise legal strategy is much more important than contracts.
>>
>> That is, you really need someone who knows when legal services make the
>> business stronger and when they get in the way. I'm after your advice on how
>> to find such a person. Is this a management skill, should we be looking for
>> an advisor who's CEOed a few companies, or can I trust a lawyer to tell me
>> how much I should use them?
>>
>> P.S.
>> A need for good legal strategy and understanding of where it fits in the big
>> picture became even clearer for me today. An actor I know complained on
>> facebook about a recent job he had as an extra:
>> "some company had hired all these extras, given them (as in ex gratia)
>> shares in their company so that they were stake holders, and had them vote
>> in one of their general meetings to prevent a hostile take over bid
>> ... apparently
>> it was legal"


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Silicon Beach 
Australia mailing list.

Guidelines on discussion: 
http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia/msg/351e183e1303508d?hl=en%3Fhl%3Den

No lurkers! It is expected that you introduce yourself.

To post to this group, send email to
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/silicon-beach-australia?hl=en?hl=en

Reply via email to