On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 06:18, Udhay Shankar N wrote: > ><silklist@lists.hserus.net>: host frodo.hserus.net[204.74.68.40] said: 550 > > Administrative Prohibition - See > > http://spamblock.outblaze.com/67.188.111.216 (in reply to RCPT
What's Danny doing running an MTA on a Comcast IP (dynamically allocated), when Comcast has a "No Servers" policy? Did I mention I'm interviewing with Comcast on Friday (phone interview, I travel later)? If I were his provider's abuse desk (which I may actually BE in a few weeks), he'd get a stern talking to. Direct to MX from dynamic IPs is almost 100% spam. Back on the topic of EFF's stance on Goodmail, they've been out of step on email and spam issues ever since John Gilmore had his mailserver listed by MAPS as an open relay (It was, intentionally, and he refused to close it, which nearly cost him his hosting). While I'd stand behind the EFF on almost anything else, I've never been steered wrong by turning 180 degrees from any position they have on spam. --B -- Brian McNett: Forensic Spam Investigator Work: <http://consult.spamresource.com/> Play: <http://www.mycoinfo.com/> Online Store: <http://store.mycoinfo.com/>
