Srini RamaKrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On a related note, the to-be-read pile increases monotonically. > > > > Yes, here too. And the kid isn't even here yet. > > > Is that necessarily a bad sign? I have a huge to-be-read pile as do > most > folks I know.
Well, what *is* depressing is not the size of the pile, but the impression that it is not humanly possible to catch up. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotonically_increasing > P.S. Udhay, yes, your copy of "Expiration Date" is on my to-be-read > pile. I strongly recommend it. As also a strong recommendation for you to move it up the pile. Udhay -- ((Udhay Shankar N)) ((udhay @ pobox.com)) ((www.digeratus.com))
