Hmm: > > I'm not sure what exactly this means - Madhu, can you expand? Does this > mean that yahoogroups will not support archiving of externally hosted > lists anymore? This sounds dumb to me, for at least 2 reasons: >
AFAIK, Silk was an edge case that wasn't cleanly caught. It just might get handled :) > > 2. It just doesn't make commercial sense to throw away traffic - > especially traffic for which you're not even incurring the associated > cost of running a list for! > I'll try and dig up what plans are going on re: external lists. Cheerio, M -- Madhu M Kurup /* Nemo Me Impune Lacessit */ mmk at yahoo-inc dt com
