On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 12:04:43PM +0530, Raj Shekhar wrote: > Spamassassin has been able to tag most of these messages as spam > successfully for me(I am using debain's default setup). For example, > here is X-Spam-Status from one such message > " > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=24.406 tagged_above=-1000 required=3.5 > tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS=1.447, > EXTRA_MPART_TYPE=1.091, > HELO_DYNAMIC_DHCP=3.066, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=4.2, > HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_04=3.6, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, > RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.558, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=2.046, > RCVD_IN_XBL=3.897] > " > > A large number of small scores add up to give such messages a high score.
Of course, for a large body of blocked messages there are several/day
(at the current level of spam and current quality of countermeasures) which
are not recognized:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE
autolearn=no version=3.1.0
I admit my current setup wouldn't help if spam went up by a couple or
two orders of magnitude, but then, it's rather a mouth-breather.
By the time I would have to sink serious resources into it I'd
be the first to admit that spam is no longer other people's problem.
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
