Of course, the kids have figured out how to surf porn on them OLPC's.

http://africa.reuters.com/wire/news/usnL19821905.html

A computer in every pot
Jul 27th 2007
>From Economist.com

The $100 laptop is fast becoming a reality

BACK at the dawn of the personal-computer era, in the late 1970s,
millions of future programmers around the world got their first taste
of writing software by using an ingenious little computer that cost
less than $100 (about $240 in today's money).

For the vast majority of individuals who could not afford the $2,500
(more than $6,000 today) that IBM and others were about to start
charging for their revolutionary PCs, the diminutive Sinclair ZX80 and
its ZX81 successor were inspirations. If you didn't mind soldering the
motherboard together yourself, the laptop-sized computer could be had
in kit form for around $70. Your correspondent built two, one of each
model. For a while Clive Sinclair, the innovative genius behind the
ZX80/81 and much else, was the patron saint of schoolboys of all ages
everywhere.

Sir Clive's current equivalent is Nicholas Negroponte, co-founder of
the Media Laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and
the father of one of the worthiest causes in contemporary computing.
In the sweep of its ambition, Mr Negroponte's pet project, One Laptop
Per Child (OLPC), is remarkably similar to the thinking behind the
original ZX80—giving inquisitive but economically deprived children
the chance to feel the exhilaration of computer-based learning.

This week sees the realisation of Mr Negroponte's five-year dream.
After field testing in Nigeria and Brazil, the OLPC project's first
model, a rugged little green laptop called the XO that can run on
batteries, solar power, a miniature windmill or hand- or foot-crank,
goes into mass production. Schoolchildren in developing countries will
start receiving the remarkable computer from October onwards.

The first batch is being supplied to some 30 of the world's poorest
countries for $176 apiece. As production builds up at Quanta, the huge
Taiwanese laptop-maker that is producing the machine for OLPC, Mr
Negroponte hopes to drive the unit cost down to $100.

After more than a quarter century of progress, Moore's Law (chipmakers
double the power of their semiconductors every 18 months or so) would
suggest that the modern equivalent of the Sinclair machine should be
about 20 times smarter. In reality, the XO is more like 1,000 times
better. That's because innovations in information technology are not
just cumulative; in closely coupled fields, they can have powerful
multiplier effects. Also, some very smart people have refused to
accept the conventional wisdom about how personal computers should be
designed.

Overall, the XO tips the scale at around half the weight of a
comparable laptop, gets over twice the usual running time when
operating on battery power and costs less than half the normal price
of an entry-level computer. One of the tricks has been to make many of
the XO's components serve at least two purposes.
EPA
EPA

Wonder toy

To save power, for instance, the XO's liquid-crystal display (the
biggest consumer of juice in a laptop) can be flipped from backlit
colour to self-reflecting monochrome. That not only saves electricity,
but helps the screen to be seen better in bright sunlight, where many
XOs are likely to be used.

The number crunching is done by an AMD Geode processor running at a
modest 433 megahertz, compared with the 2-3 gigahertz of conventional
laptops. This processor allows the XO to use less energy and therefore
generate much less heat. Result: no power-consuming cooling fan.

Indeed, all rotating parts have been dispensed with—to make the XO
rugged enough for the wild. Instead of a hard drive, for instance, the
XO uses a one-gigabyte "flash" chip to store data even when the power
is off. The keyboard has a waterproof rubber coating and the case is
sealed to prevent dust from encroaching. A pair of wireless antennas
swivel up from the screen's sides like rabbit ears, endowing the
laptop with two to three times the normal Wi-Fi range. When folded
down, the antennas not only lock the case and but also seal off its
various ports.

Better still, the Wi-Fi circuitry makes every laptop not just a
communications device, but also a router. In other words, each laptop
is part of a wireless mesh that relays the broadband signal from
laptop to laptop—so those out of direct range can still get a
connection to the internet.

If the ingenuity of the XO's hardware is impressive, the machine's
software is truly ground-breaking. Red Hat, the world's largest Linux
distributor, has provided an extremely compact version of its Fedora
operating system, called Sugar, that uses a mere 130 megabytes of the
XO's flash memory. By comparison, Windows XP requires 1.65 gigabytes.

The XO comes with a word processor, PDF viewer, Firefox web browser,
media player, drawing tools plus the usual set of utilities. But it is
the way the Sugar operating system lets the user work that's so
clever. Instead of the usual hierarchical view of a computer's
applications and data, Sugar organises everything around what has been
used recently. Alternatively, it can group applications and files in
terms of who is connected on the wireless mesh. As such, the mesh
approach gives XO an array of collaborative tools that puts expensive
business laptops to shame.

Clearly, trying to produce such an extraordinary product as a laptop
that is kid-proof and capable of working in jungles, deserts or the
bush, miles from the nearest grid connection, and all for the cheapest
possible price, has concentrated minds remarkably. The XO offers a
lesson for laptop-makers everywhere. In fact, quite a few have gone
from ridiculing the OLPC project to trying to emulate or join it.

Most notable has been Intel. After first dismissing Mr Negroponte's
laptop as a toy, the chipmaking giant suddenly rushed out a spoiler
design of its own for developing countries, fearing it was about to be
left out of an emerging market. Called Classmate, Intel's $225 laptop
has failed to impress. Last week Intel admitted defeat tacitly by
asking to join the OLPC association.

The question now is when can the rest of us get laptops as cheap and
clever as the OLPC's radical design? Judging from the stir the XO has
created, the answer is more likely to be months rather than years.

http://economist.com/research/articlesBySubject/displaystory.cfm?subjectid=7933610&story_id=9539441

Reply via email to