On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 04:31:05PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Oh yeah, and Brad Templeton insisting its going to be a pipe dream because > nobody is going to care / spend enough to build a workable system
Why should we care about what Brad Templeton thought 1995? Despite all noises to the contrary, people would kill if given a slight chance to live forever. The only reason cryonics is being laughed upon is because people think it is a scam (and no celebrities are doing it). (Notice that Brian Wowk is actively working on the problem, while Brad Templeton... What the fuck does Brad Templeton do, these days?) The suspension technology is well-developed, albeit lacking quality control and wide infrastructure. The technology required for resurrection involves computers with ~mole number of switches and/or machine-phase nanosystems a la http://www.nanomedicine.com Cryolazarusse would be a side effect of such technology. > http://www.cryonet.org/cgi-bin/dsp.cgi?msg=5253 -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
