Thaths, Deepa, thanks :) If some of the 'lazy reporters' image could be repaired, am glad. :)
> Slowly? Catching on? I recall reading excellent process reporting in > the 80's on issues such as what happened in Bhopal and how exactly the > money was kicked back in the Bofors scandal. > Don't get me wrong, there was always process coverage. Even now, with something like the nuclear deal, there's quite a bit of news analysis in the papers. The question is to what extent does process get covered and what extent event. Right now, the balance is skewed towards news coverage. And the idea of increasing process coverage is catching on. As an aside, the difference between the way the the public reacted to the Bofors scandal and the response to investigative journalism today is quite interesting. >is this published anywhere? > Or..is it not newsworthy? The effect of online media on traditional print media has been documented quite extensively. The changing newsrooms, challenges, etc. I could dig up some stuff and send it across if you'd be interested. :) Sruthi
