On Tuesday 20 Apr 2010 2:48:06 am Charles Haynes wrote:
>  From it has flowed a river of
> religious violence in the name of Hinduism deliberately encouraged by
> people using Hinduism to perpetrate religious and political violence
> against non-Hindus.

This is such a blinkered and restricted  view of the history of Hindu violence 
that it classifies as ignorance.

Why do you think the pagans (Hindus) of India survived with many of their 
beliefs intact while the religions Christianity and Islam overran and 
eliminated  the pagans of Africa, Europe and much of Asia? It is because 
Hindus were violent enough to kill others. Even Buddhism was beaten and sent 
out of India to places where it is now being beaten and replaced by Islam. 
There is, and was  plenty of violence that Hindus do not like to admit

Since apparently well read people do not seem to have heard the usual cliches 
that are spouted, let me point out how "religions" or groups of people  
claiming to support a religion have used a Goebbelsian propaganda tactic to 
usurp certain expressions to describe themselves while they commit the most 
horrendous acts of debauchery and violence on a  gullible human population. 

"Hindus" of course have latched on to "Tolerant" as a byword. We have been 
discussing the limits of Hindu tolerance, such as exists in thie theradIslam 
has corneerd for itself f the word "Peace" and people go about describing 
Islam as a religion of "peace" whihc is rubbish. There is, and was plenty of 
violence that Muslims will not admit.

And Christianity hseems to have grabbed for itself the words "love" 
and "forviveness" while the actions of Chritsiany from 1 minute after Christ 
died have been anything but love and/or forgiveness. There is, and was, 
plenty of violence that Christians will not admit.

i am not sure how educated thinking people get fooled by buzzwords. Maybe that 
is why advertsing is such huge business. But the point I want to make is "I 
will not allow anyone to escape being called a bullshitter if he tries to say 
that some action is justifiable because it is his (or someone else's) 
religion"

So friggin what if it is someone's religion? 

shiv






Reply via email to