>>
>
> I showed your mail to my wife Shashi who is also deeply intersted in this. One
> of her pet peeves is why children are rigidly clubbed by age in schools.
>
> I was reminded of a study (in the US I think)  that showed how children born
> in the first half of the year were on average better at sport than children
> born in the second half of the year. The reason was that in a given class,
> little children born earlier in a given year are just that much older and
> physically bigger and stronger than children born later who are just a little
> youner and smaller. When you are 6 years old, 6 or 7 months make a big
> difference.
>
> The same holds true for learning other skills. But the education system is too
> dumb to undertand.
>
My son's school, which is not that mainstream, has such activities.
They have a mixed age group, the kids in nursery do stuff together
during such sessions. Similarly class 1-4 get together, grouped by
house colours, on projects. Recently each house did a project on some
state of India, there was enormous effort put in by each kid over a
month, and each child got to do and learn something; they presented it
all one day, inviting all parents, showing off their creations and
knowledge from weaving to food items to wildlife...I appreciate the
teachers who mentored them..

I think Biju's right, there is a small but definite minority, that is changing.

-Meera

Reply via email to