---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lawnun <lawnun+mailingl...@gmail.com <lawnun%2bmailingl...@gmail.com>>
Date: Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: [silk] Close the Washington Monument
To: Heather Madrone <heat...@madrone.com>


Rule 34 suggests that such a thing already exists... Alas, I have been
unable to find anything relating to the Washington Monument, sex or sexual
aids of the 'monumental' variety.  Pity.  I see a business opportunity.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Rule%2034

On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Heather Madrone <heat...@madrone.com>wrote:

>  On 12/22/10 10:36 PM December 22, 2010, Lawnun wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Nikhil Mehra 
> <nikhil.mehra...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> You know this just might be an Indian speaking, but I seriously want you
>> very privileged American bastards (and I was till recently one of them by
>> sheer virtue of having lived there) to truly fearfully deal with "terror
>> cynicism or theatre", to know Schneier's article is everything but fantasy.
>> So, he suggests tough access. Fuck you!
>>
>>  ...
>
> Counselor --
>
> In general, if you're trying to advance your argument, it might be
> worthwhile to stick to a position, articulate that position clearly and with
> then move on.  As it stands,  can neither tell whether you think we're
> better off closing the monument, leaving it open, or using it as a sexual
> aid.
>
> Just saying.
>
> Carey (an American who neither supports any of this, nor quite gets the
> need for all the vitriol)
>
>   ~
>
> Oh, come on, Carey, be broad-minded here. If someone wants to use the
> Washington Monument as a sexual aid, it should be fine as long as they put
> the video on youtube under a NSFW tag.
>
> [I was puzzled for a long time by the acronym SLYT, which certainly sounds
> like it ought to be dirty but in fact stands for Single Link YouTube.]
>
> --
> Heather Madrone  (heat...@madrone.com)  
> http://www.madrone.comhttp://www.sunsplinter.blogspot.com
>
> I'd love to change the world, but they won't give me access to the source 
> code.
>
>
>

Reply via email to