---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Lawnun <lawnun+mailingl...@gmail.com <lawnun%2bmailingl...@gmail.com>> Date: Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 5:52 PM Subject: Re: [silk] Close the Washington Monument To: Heather Madrone <heat...@madrone.com>
Rule 34 suggests that such a thing already exists... Alas, I have been unable to find anything relating to the Washington Monument, sex or sexual aids of the 'monumental' variety. Pity. I see a business opportunity. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Rule%2034 On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Heather Madrone <heat...@madrone.com>wrote: > On 12/22/10 10:36 PM December 22, 2010, Lawnun wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Nikhil Mehra > <nikhil.mehra...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> You know this just might be an Indian speaking, but I seriously want you >> very privileged American bastards (and I was till recently one of them by >> sheer virtue of having lived there) to truly fearfully deal with "terror >> cynicism or theatre", to know Schneier's article is everything but fantasy. >> So, he suggests tough access. Fuck you! >> >> ... > > Counselor -- > > In general, if you're trying to advance your argument, it might be > worthwhile to stick to a position, articulate that position clearly and with > then move on. As it stands, can neither tell whether you think we're > better off closing the monument, leaving it open, or using it as a sexual > aid. > > Just saying. > > Carey (an American who neither supports any of this, nor quite gets the > need for all the vitriol) > > ~ > > Oh, come on, Carey, be broad-minded here. If someone wants to use the > Washington Monument as a sexual aid, it should be fine as long as they put > the video on youtube under a NSFW tag. > > [I was puzzled for a long time by the acronym SLYT, which certainly sounds > like it ought to be dirty but in fact stands for Single Link YouTube.] > > -- > Heather Madrone (heat...@madrone.com) > http://www.madrone.comhttp://www.sunsplinter.blogspot.com > > I'd love to change the world, but they won't give me access to the source > code. > > >