Hi all,
While on topic of wired, there is a very inspirational article on Chris 
Anderson of Wired which I found it very inspirational 
http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/14/out-of-hobby-class-drones-lifting-off-for-personal/?page=all#dsq-form-area
Btw thought I should add a disclaimer, that I am one of the members of 
diydrones community as a consumer of products, moderator on diydrones and as 
member of developer community.
Regards

Anish Mohammed
Twitter: anishmohammed
http://uk.linkedin.com/in/anishmohammed

On 15 Mar 2012, at 04:16, Dibyo <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 14 March 2012 18:17, Udhay Shankar N <[email protected]> wrote:
> Each one of these recommendations for cultivating genius seems stupidly
> obvious. And yet, almost no modern state manages to tick these 3 boxes.
> The whole article can be summarised as follows:
> 
> Encourage immigration.
> Encourage education.
> Encourage risk-taking.
> 
> Simple enough? And yet...
> 
> Udhay
> 
> PS: I love the phrase 'talent clots inhomogeneously'.
> 
> http://www.wired.com/magazine/2012/02/st_essay_genius
> 
> Cultivating Genius in the 21st Century
> 
>    By Jonah Lehrer
>    February 28, 2012 |
>    Wired March 2012
> 
> Most economic growth has a very simple source: new ideas. It is our
> creativity that generates wealth. So how can we increase the pace of
> innovation? Is it possible to inspire more Picassos and Steve Jobses?
> 
> 
> 
> Interesting read, but like the others in this thread, I think human-nature, 
> the inherent resistance to change and the fear of the new trumps common 
> sense. Vote banks don't like change, hence governments think twice.
> 
> I live in Singapore at the moment, and while the government, on the surface 
> of it, is trying hard to tick all these boxes, the average joe doesn't like 
> it, even though my opinion is that everyone has benefited from it. The reason 
> is that economic progress causes financial inequality in the short-term which 
> in turn causes resistance. If a country like this, which is imminently 
> manageable and relatively well-off, can't do this without resistance, imagine 
> how a larger, more chaotic country (like mine) would pull something like this 
> off.
> 
> Also, would you agree with the statement that the USA is fundamentally built 
> on these principles (over the last 100 years, not necessarily at this point 
> in time)
> 
> 
> Dibyo
> 
>  
> 

Reply via email to