Reid You really are something else again I am not the stupid one here and that is becoming more apparent as time goes on.
I think that I frighten you and that is why you started calling me names so that I would go away. I don't need to analyse any of the CS I use as it is analysed by the company I purchase it from everytime it is made and if I really was concerned or worried all I would ever have to do was call and it would be faxed to me, that is how comfortable I am with the product I use. How about some credentials, or don't you have any !!!! You see Reid, the difference between us is I am not ashamed to have no credentials but you must be or you would tell me and the list what they are. Beverley At 05:06 AM 1/31/97 GMT, you wrote: >>> BTW since we've stop calling names >>Do you think that calling me a moron is how you stop calling names? >>> and maybe called a truse my parcitcal >>It is you that has to stop calling names !! > > Let's see the statement was "Stupid to think that .00? is a ppm test" >I beleave was the statement that you used. > >>Only uncredible companies produce a product with that kind of PPM and to my >>unscientific knowledge PPM is not stated that way. In order for PPM to >>be of any value it should be between 5 - 10 PPM. > > Right have you tested any of yours or you just a victom? > > >Reid > > > >
