I'm testing three samples of CS over a longer period of time to get
some idea of what's going on and also to evaluate the ppm meter...

I made a batch of CS on January 22. I had two samples from different 
portions of it tested. I also measured it when I first got the ppm 
meter, and again today. Here are the results:

Note:
EQL = Environmental Quality Labs, Inc, Sterling Heights, MI
TDS = TDS-1 Total Dissolved Solids meter from Hanna Instruments.

Batch #1, sample A, made 1/22/98

date         ppm      method
02/03/98    26 ppm    EQL
02/19/98    17 ppm    TDS
03/07/98    15 ppm    TDS

Batch #1, sample B, made 1/22/98

date         ppm      method
02/03/98    22 ppm    EQL
02/19/98    14 ppm    TDS
03/07/98    12 ppm    TDS

I made another batch of CS using the same recipe on February 5th. It 
measured 21 ppm on the TDS-1 meter both on February 19th and today:

Batch #2, made 2/5/98

date         ppm      method
02/19/98    21 ppm    TDS
03/07/98    21 ppm    TDS

So the first batch seems to be decaying, somehow, while the second 
batch is holding steady.

I can think of two reasons this is happening. The second batch might 
have been filtered a little better. I pushed most of it through the 
same filter I used to filter the entire first batch, which showed 
signs of starting to clog. I filtered the last little bit through 
another fresh filter.

The other reason might be the way in which I made my starter. The 
protocol involves making a quart of "starter" that I divide up, 8 
ounces into each of 4 quart canning jars. The first batch, I made the 
starter from "scratch", starting with just water and running almost 
an hour and a half. For the second batch, I "started the starter" 
with 8 ounces of CS from another batch, which shortened the run 
time to about 45 minutes.

If one method produces a wider distribution of particle sizes, then 
the first batch may have some bigger particles that are settling out 
over time, while the second batch might be "cleaner."

I think I will submit a sample from each of the two batches to the 
testing lab again and take meter readings before and after to bracket 
the lab tests. I really want to see if the calibrations are the same 
between the meter and the lab test. If so, we're *really* in 
business!

That's it for now!

Mike D.

[Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian]
[mdev...@mail.id.net                       ]
[Speaking only for myself...              ]


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: 
silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com  -or-  silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com
with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the subject: line.

To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com

List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@id.net>