I believe they mean deionized water. Both are a question of purity.
Just as distilled water can still have sufficient impurities to cause
problems, deionized water can as well. However deionized water only
specifically has most foreign ions removed. Non-ionic impurities can
still be present. Impurities such as sugar, aromatic hydrocarbons and
alcohols probably have little effect (although unhealthy anyway). Others
such as covalent sulfur compounds could be a significant problem since
sulfur will react with silver producing silver sulfide, or tarnish.
Such sulfur compound can be in the form of amino acids, thiols,
disulfides, thioesters, thioethers, thioacetals, sulfranses and
persulfranes. Some of these compounds are naturally occuring, such as
allicin and ajoene, the foul smelling part of garlic, and other
compounds are fractions of natural gas and oil. (such as the compound
that gives commercially distributed gas its characteristic odor).
Marshall
Misc. IP Group wrote:
Any comments please?????
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Misc. IP Group [mailto:m...@ipgroupltd.com]
Sent: 14 April 2007 01:20
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CS>OT = Distilled vs Ionized Water (Drinking)
Hi Somewhat OT, but with the discussions of concentrace etc, it reminded me
to ask.
What do people think of the discussions between distilled water and ionized
water for drinking?
Thanks
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
----------------------------------------------------
This message has been processed by Firetrust Benign.
