Yup, that's the answer. Both methods work well. Boiling is not
necessary, nor is it bad either.
If you look at Peter Lindemann's article at:
http://www.elixa.com/silver/lindmn.htm
... you'll see he mentions the effect of temperature on production
rate and particle size.
But, as we've been talking about lately, current limiting can
probably get you the particle size advantage, though at the expense
of time.
The good news? It *all* works if you put the pieces together right.
<GRIN>
Be well,
Mike D.
> On Thu, 01 Jul 1999 16:51:07 Pam Whitmire wrote:
> >Please, silver gurus, give us some input on heating water. I have heard
> >and read many opinions now: No question about it, heat or boil the
> >water...then the other side says NO, my God, don't even consider heating
> >the water! Can some of you smart folks give us the reasons for and
> >against?
Earle wrote:
> I boil it only because it is recommended for consistency purposes! I
> just had some samples tested using boiled and unboiled cs. The
> boiled cs had a slightly smaller particle size. The unboiled had a
> better tyndall effect, the boiled was weak. What does it mean? They
> were both good, both close to the same ppm, so I'll boil just for
> consistency's sake if it is!
[Mike Devour, Citizen, Patriot, Libertarian]
[mdev...@mail.id.net ]
[Speaking only for myself... ]
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com
with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@id.net>
