I thought that free radicals were cells which lacked an electron, and then went along and stole one from a healthy cell, which then became imbalanced also. The role of the anti oxidants is to give the unbalanced cell one of its own electrons, without imbalancing itself. If the cell does *not* have its electron replaced, then I always understood that it then went on to scavenge electrons from other cells, finally entering the DNA itself and changing that; hence, cancer. This is what I have read anyway. Dee
-- <The calender of the Theocracy of Muntab counts down, not up. No-one knows why, but it might not be a good idea to hang around and find out.> -- (Terry Pratchett, Wyrd Sisters) -------Original Message------- From: Faith Saint Francis Date: 27/06/2007 15:43:47 To: [email protected] Subject: CS>Free Radicals, Good or Bad? – a note on cancer. In C.W. Fugitt’s post I found: >>Considering they [..free rads..] exist in the body, I can't believe they are all bad.<< Indeed. They are not bad in the sense that the body MUST have the power to do away with them. A healthy body always has that power. A healthy body contains EVERYTHING nature provided, and EVERYTHING has its purpose in the system. Did you know that everybody has cancer? You and I and all of them out-there have cancer cells in our system. Continually! -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
