----- Original Message ----- From: Tai-Pan <[email protected]> >>snip<< > Seems that more people are listening now and using constant current > methods to make smaller particles. Now if more folks would get on the > current density bandwagon the CS would get even better. Makes me smile > when I read all the posts where folks act like they did something new, > when I was posting it for the last year. Got some new things coming up > anyway. Did a survey of CS web sites two years ago (saved on disk) and > not a single one mentioned constant current or current density. Re- > surveyed again last month and most all of them are now talking constant > current and some are into current density. :-) One generator maker is > offering machines that almost operate on the starved electrode method as > often posted by me. Get smiles when new techies show up and start > pontificating about their knowledge and understanding of CS. Recall a > post I had made and the very next day its content showed up on six > sites. :-) > I see the CS becoming better and more effective as we learn to taylor > it for the application. Thats very good. >>snip<<
I must say that a post by Bob (starved electrode etc.) in the middle of last year, helped me to understand just what was going on with some tests I had done when I could not find answers anywhere else. His opinions are most valuable. I too have championed the current limit protocol at a lower current probably than most, but have noticed recently a couple of generators that limit to 0.5mA who seemed to have arrived at this point independently. Some people out there are thinking. Ivan. -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: [email protected] -or- [email protected] with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: [email protected] List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
