There is no significant difference between factual relativities in their
own context.
S Quinto makes it *look like* there is a difference by warping
definitions and contexts.
He uses TEM photos to show two entirely different things to try and prove
that the same things are different.
The photos used to display "particle sizes" show silver oxides made by the
drying process require to use a TEM, NOT what's in the bottle.
It's the "way" a sample is dried that makes the resulting oxide particles
smaller, NOT "what" was dried.
A TEM cannot detect an ion in a solution.
Ions can't exist without the liquid. [with a few irrelevant exceptions
pertaining to other ions in other environments that don't often include air
or water]
A TEM can't see anything, at all ..in a liquid.
Even if it could, with the field of view it has, "finding" a particle when
the concentration of particles is only 3% would be a matter of sheer luck.
Photos of mostly particles cannot represent the liquid containing mostly
-not particles-. 97% substance is not the same as 97% space.
Argentyn 23 tests out at 97% ionic.
"Puppy" samples tested out at ~85% ionic but can be much higher. A laser
gives you a clue. [Less of a beam at a given PPM = higher dissolved ionic
to colloidal particulate ratio. A meter only gives you an indication of
the the *ionic* PPM content ]
Ions are ions, are ions.
Silver Oxide particles made by drying silver ions to put them on a slide a
TEM can use, are NOT " silver particles" or even Silver Oxide
particles....in a bottle.
If they were, that bottle of water would appear quite brown to black and a
meter not register anything relevant to "silver" at all.
Those who have used both say they cannot tell the difference. [But don't
say *how* they looked at them either.]
I Assume that the instruments used were eyeballs and taste buds, possibly
laser pointer and meter.
This from Frank Key...he knows his science. [But.... no one but Frank knows
what Meso-Silver is nor do I see mentioned the range of what silver
*particles* are "considered" to actually be......certainly not ...all
...."metallic" silver in every case, but that's the only case I see
mentioned. ]
In other words: What Franks says is accurate and not deceptive, but he
doesn't say ....everything....allowing the reader to reach a conclusion
about a product that may or may not be accurate.
What Steven says is clearly mis-leading, if not entirely "technically"
untrue...if you maintain that mixing technicalities is not lying. [like
legalese, the language of intentionally warped meanings used to avoid
"lying" by letting the reader determine where the subject of a discussion
shifted contexts while pointing to cleverly placed possibilities designed
to point in the wrong direction. ]
" 9 out of 10 doctors recommend THIS pill over all others combined" [That
one doctor who recommended combining all other pills.... killed the
patient. NONE of the patients should have listened to ANY of the
recommendations. *Technically*, the dead guy committed suicide by way of
ignorance and the living were just lucky. The statement says nothing about
any pills. It speaks of doctors and recommendations. ]
http://www.silver-colloids.com/Reports/reports.html
* Ionic Silver Solutions
The vast majority of products labeled and sold as colloidal silver fall
into this category due to the low degree of manufacturing complexity and
resulting low cost of production. The silver content in these products
consists of both
<http://silver-colloids.com/Papers/definitions.html#silver.ion>silver ions
and
<http://silver-colloids.com/Papers/definitions.html#silver.particles>silver
particles. Typically, 90% of the silver content is in the form of
<http://www.silver-colloids.com/Papers/definitions.html#ionic.silver>ionic
silver and the remaining 10% of the silver content is in the form of silver
particles. The silver ions are produced by electrolysis and may be
described as dissolved silver. Products produced by electrolysis are
frequently described as "electro colloids". Because the majority of the
silver content in these products is dissolved silver rather than metallic
silver particles, it would be more technically accurate to describe these
products as silver solutions.
Confusingly, ads for these products frequently claim that silver ions are
small silver particles or describe the product as consisting of ionic
silver particles. Silver ions are not the same as silver particles and the
two terms are not interchangeable. Ionic silver is also referred to as
monatomic silver and silver hydrosol by some producers who choose not to
describe their products using the scientifically correct terminology. These
are marketing terms used to hide the truth that what is being sold is an
ionic silver solution. For more details read
<http://silver-colloids.com/Pubs/AboutIonic.html>About Ionic Silver.
http://silver-colloids.com/Pubs/AboutIonic.html
http://silver-colloids.com/Pubs/TEM.html
Ode
At 02:17 PM 8/13/2007 -0500, you wrote:
Hi everyone. Does anyone here know if there is any significant difference
between
Argentyn 23 and what we would make at home with a Silver Puppy generator?
Thanks. Jodi
-- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To
post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic
messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off
Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.11.17/951 - Release Date: 8/13/2007
10:15 AM
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.11.17/951 - Release Date: 8/13/2007
10:15 AM
