On Sun, 5 Oct 2008 20:46:30 -0700 "Arnold Beland" <abela...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Mike D. writes: > > "Blanket statements that particulate is good and ionic is bad are > likely as incomplete and inaccurate as their opposite numbers." > > Their genesis is invariably the profit motive. > > > No, not necessarily. My argument was based on a particular understanding of chemistry and theory of metabolic response; I am not selling anything. My motive is simply to conquer a debilitating MRSA. Of course on second thought I do realize that what I failed to consider is that in practice, things rarely work precisely as they do in theory. As far as I know, *theoretically* it appears that if you want to get the maximum benefit of silver (for its antimicrobial effect) you will get more bio-available silver in your system with true colloidal. However, Mike makes an interesting point about sublingual absorption. And there are also many studies which show that micro doses of various compounds can be very effective under certain conditions -- some say more effective than traditional-sized doses. I guess it all comes down to which theory you want to start investigating. So I find I must recant my blanket statement. All I really know is that true colloidal has worked wonders for me, and that ionic did not seem to do anything for me. But as they say, YMMV. -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
