I agree. Plus Bolan has targeted an organization which is one of the
good guys, and for what reason I really don't know. He has targeted
spamhaus, which for me prevents up to 10,000 spam emails a day from
pharmaceutical companies selling things like viagra going into my
mailbox. In fact the huge number of spams hitting my mail system was as
high as 25 per second, and was crashing my server before learning how
spamhaus would allow me to use their black lists of ips to block them
before they even make it in.
Marshall
sol wrote:
Marshall Dudley wrote:
I think basically an expose' on the quackbusters operation. Bolan
especially can be pretty liberal with his comments using words like
scum and so forth. I think basically the courts found that the use
of such derogatory terms were merited by the actions of quackbusters
and associates.
Bolen would be much more taken seriously if he would stop using
derogatory terms, and flippant 7th grade insults. Not that his targets
do not deserve them, but it makes him seem shallow and fanatical.
I know I respond much better to reasoned arguments without that stuff.
While I agree with Bolen on much of his writing about quackwatch, I
cringe at the juvenile insults. Barrett, et.al. are quite bad enough
that it should be easy to discredit them while using more adult language.
sol
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
