Since it is recommended, and indeed works much better, to switch the DC polarity periodically, it would make sense for AC to work. I really don't understand why it would not, since all it does is switch polarity periodically, albeit faster then you could do with a manual switch.
I have always used DC, but not switched it until recently. The question that pops out of this then is: What is the optimum switching time? If not 60 cycles per second then what? And why? And I have read every one of those articles below and much more. Been making silver for several years now. Just trying to refine the technique and scale up to faster production. First step is to develop the best method. Dick ________________________________ From: "cking...@nycap.rr.com" <cking...@nycap.rr.com> To: silver-list@eskimo.com Sent: Fri, December 11, 2009 6:24:05 PM Subject: Re: CS>ac or dc? The answer is DC. If you didn't know that, you are woefully behind in your understanding of CS creation and your research. Suggested: http://silver-lightning.com/theory.html http://silver-lightning.com/research.html http://www.colloidalsilver.com.au/FREE-DIY.html http://www.silver-colloids.com/Book/SilverColloids-s.pdf http://www.fugitt.com/cs_notes/ Chuck When you are not looking at it, this sentence is in Spanish On 12/11/2009 1:19:46 PM, Richard Goodwin (dickgoodwin2...@yahoo.com) wrote: > Which do you think works better for making EIS, DC that you have to switch > polarity on every minute or so, or AC, assuming everything else is equal? > > Dick -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
