Good points, Steve. I agree with you about strip mining, but I'm wondering if strip mining has anything to do with mutated fish and frogs nationwide? I still think one of the more harmful things being done is for individuals and hospitals nationwide to flush tons of King Pharma's drugs down so many toilets that it gets into the ground water and drinking water and effects wildlife, human life and fish life everywhere. Strip mining, although dangerous to life where it is done (and should be halted by the EPA) is not done everywhere. I don't believe for a second that silver, which heals so many things in humans, including some illnesses and diseases of animals, that it could be responsible for mutated fish and frogs. I don't remember ever reading about mutated fish and frogs until King Pharma came into existence. I think Mercola on the wrong track with this one. Yeah, some of his info is good, but not in this case. I know the EPA is being pushed by King Pharma to regulate silver as a pesticide. It's just part of their evolution towards banning silver as a healer altogether. King Pharma is just trying to get people on their team in order to push this further along down the ban road.
John On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Norton, Steve <stephen.nor...@ngc.com>wrote: > I am from Kentucky and I don't think that the use of silver can ever > come close to the ecological damage caused by mountain top strip mines. > Both to the environment ant to the health of the residents near, and > sometimes not so near, the strip mine. While that does not justify > potential damage by silver, I think it puts it better into perspective. > And the state and federal agencies do nothing about strip mining. Not a > damn thing. > - Steve N > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dorothy Fitzpatrick [mailto:d...@deetroy.org] > Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 11:10 AM > To: silver-list@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: CS>Nanosilver migrates... > > You can't know that it hasn't harmed anything John, you are only > assuming that it hasn't. Who knows what happened round silver mines > etc., no data was kept I presume. And most things in a natural > environment and not concentrated, *don't* harm things on any sort of > scale. It is only when anything becomes popular and all of a sudden > *everyone* is jumping on the band wagon to put it in their products, > that the trouble starts. > You are right about Big Pharma doing *far* more damage with their drugs > and plant, and also that they are probably at the bottom of the FDA's > stance in this matter. I don't agree about Mercola though, he is just > ignorant of the good that silver can do, but he doesn't condemn it > outright, just voices concerns. dee > > On 2 Feb 2010, at 14:42, John E. Stevens wrote: > > > It seems he's lining up with the EPA in wanting to make silver a > pesticide. There are too many tons of King Pharma's drugs flushed down > the toilets by not only individuals, but hospitals, too, that get into > the ground water. And there are tons of oil based pesticides and oil > based fertilizers that get into ground water, too. I'd look at those > aspects first before declaring silver is a danger to anything. Silver > is natural. It never harmed fish or other wildlife for thousands of > years. Why would it be doing it now? Seems like another eventual FDA > and EPA plot to ban CSW making machines down the road. Samsung includes > a CSW maker in their washing machines because they know it kills off > harmful bacteria. > > > > John > > > > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > > Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com > > The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com> > > >
