Thank you Brooks:)
I figured it would be more expensive to use Rife
frequencies, but was just curious if it could be
done, since frequencies are frequencies, well of
different shapes and etc., but still frequencies
all the same:) I got to thinking about it, and the
curiosity was eating me alive, LOL.
Bethann
Control your destiny or somebody else will.~Jack Welsh
Brooks Bradley wrote:
Dear Annie,
Rife Frequencies are the result of imposing (mixing) one frequency
(usually somewhere between about 10 cycles per second to 20,000cps)upon
a single carrier wave in the Megahertz range [some use around 11,000,000
cps and some use about 27,000,000....generally) which results in a
"modulated" output
of a "distinctive" square wave....which contains thousands of secondary
frequencies occurring within each square wave envelope. The real problem is
determining the genuinely "effective" resultant frequency which actually
destroys the pathogen. That is, there is NO PRESENTLY EXISTING
methodology for determining which specific frequency----EXACTLY--- (from
among the thousands present in the plasma field---that is creating the
resonance which destroys
the pathogen.) The only thing one knows, for sure, is the INPUT
FREQUENCY imposed on the carrier wave......not the actual KILLING
frequency. This said, one could...if they possessed an acceptable Rife
Generation System with an ADEQUATE power amplifier.....and a
precise/stable Frequency Generator....use it to drive
a piezoelectric (crystal) or even a "well-filtered" magnetic transducer.
Ultrasound generators for US Cleaners generally employ frequencies
between 20 KHZ (20,000 cps) and 40 KHZ. Both the wave shape (sinusoidal
or square)
and the power levels....have definite effects upon the efficiency of the
cleaner.....as does the type of transducer being used (piezoelectric or
magnetic).
Piezoelectric transducers (crystals) are more efficient at using square
waves....than are any of the wire-wound component assemblies presently
used in many cheaper units. Most of the more acceptable units are driven
by about 38 KHZ power signals. Many magnetic transducers become VERY
inefficient at frequencies this high....if only because of the powerful
resistance (Inductive Reactance) to the rapidly changing voltages.
I do not mean to pontificate, but sometimes we are lead to OBVIOUS
conclusions which are not altogether reliable. That is why I have taken
the time to elaborate, somewhat, on this aspect of the two technologies.
Bottom Line: It is MARKEDLY less expensive to purchase an acceptable
Ultrasonic Cleaner.....than ANY form (Gas Plasma or Contact Plate) of
Rife Generation system. (about $80.00 versus $1000. plus).
Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.
---------[ Received Mail Content ]----------
*Subject : *Re: CS>Cross Post on Cheap Ultrasonic Cleaners
*Date : *Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:50:23 -0500
*From : *Annie B Smythe <anniebsmy...@gmail.com>
*To : *silver-l...@eskimo.com
That's very interesting, if it's just a frequency
generator, would Rife frequencies work?
Annie
Control your destiny or somebody else will.~Jack Welsh
Norton, Steve wrote:
>
>
> FYI.
>
>
>
> *From:* Norton, Steve
> *Sent:* Monday, March 15, 2010 8:42 AM
> *To:*
> *Subject:* WARNING liposomal vitamin C
>
>
>
> Paul,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the warning and for the info on the construction of
the cheap
> ultrasonic cleaner. I have a number of unused ultrasonic
humidifiers and
> have considered removing and using the ultrasonic transducers for
> several other applications. It appears that they may indeed be
suitable
> for use in ultrasonic cleaner applications easier than I thought
if all
> you have to do is glue the transducer to the bottom of a metal pan.
>
>
>
> - Steve N
>
>
>
> *From:* [mailto: *On Behalf Of *Paul
> *Sent:* Sunday, March 14, 2010 5:23 PM
> *To:*
> *Subject:* WARNING liposomal vitamin C
>
>
>
>
>
> I bought a cheap Chinese ultrasonic bath to make liposomal
vitamin C a
> few months ago. It worked quite well for that purpose, but I
found that
> it wasn't sealed very well, and when pouring out the contents, some
> liquid could find its way inside the unit. I should have done
something
> about this, but didn't. A few days ago my unit caught fire,
probably due
> to this poor design, and if I had left it unattended, it could
have been
> much more serious.
>
> I have since bought a more expensive ultrasonic bath which seems
to work
> better, and is well sealed so that liquid can't get inside.
> Not just a case of "buy cheap, get cheap", more "buy cheap, burn
your
> house down!"
>
> I just thought I should pass this around in case anyone else has
bought
> a cheap ultrasonic bath.
> It should be possible to seal around the metal bath part using a hot
> glue gun, or other sealant.
>
> Incidentally, when I took the gadget apart I found it is simply a
> frequency generator, an amplifier and an ultrasonic transducer
glued to
> the bottom of the metal bath.
>
> Paul
>
> __._,_.___
>
> ,___
>
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
Unsubscribe:
Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html
Off-Topic discussions:
List Owner: Mike Devour
