Of all the sources I would trust my health to, Wikipedia is about the
last on my list. In fact, it isn't even on my list.
Whether they get their science right I am not qualified to judge, but as
they can't get very simple things right in some other fields (e.g. facts
demonstrated by census and obituary records) and correcting them is not
easy (or possible as far as I can judge) and as they seem to have a very
biased agenda, all their information is suspect to me.
I also object to your comments on V and bG in respect of the Zilla.
I don't know who you are but your writing style sounds familiar.
Rowena
On 30/04/2010 11:51 AM, Dok Dallas wrote:
Wish I had more TIME to get (seriously) involved in this discussion,
but-don't
so let me input a few-words and try to nudge Ode & Marshal toward FACTS~
I most likely, will not be back on-line again, until Sunday or
Monday...Enjoy?
*Best I can do is perhaps offer a few-more "WiKi"
LINKS...to further QUEST?*
