Renee, thank you for this.. I just kept saying, this person makes total sense.. I really like your seeing both sides, for that is my way... Thank you.
smiles sunny A peek into our world.. Feed the Future - Forest gardens - Sustainable Lifetime Food for All Feed the Future- The blog In depth articles - forest gardens, natural wellness, human consciousness WHAT has to happen for us to evolve and emerge? Follow us on Twitter - www.twitter.com/return2earth Wellness v pharma, free energy v oil, own grown v processed food, community v nuclear, natural building v concrete, consciousness v asleep Info on what's going on and alternative and natural technologies for a simpler life Tune in and friend us on Facebook - Pierre Soleil return to earth ________________________________ From: Renee <gaiac...@gmail.com> To: silver-list@eskimo.com Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 7:51:12 PM Subject: Re: CS>MMS email received today There's a big controversy over the safety of MMS as used by Jim Humble. There is an MMS list and we have a chemist on it, who says that the vomiting and diarrhea that comes from taking MMS the way Jim says is actually from chlorine poisoning rather than overload of die-off. He advocates (and uses) a 5% strength of sodium chlorite rather than the 28% MMS. There are those that have followed Jim's protocol and claim they've gotten their normal lives back after years of illness, and those that say "he saved my life" and so they are vehement against the chemist's gentler, safer protocol. Though he doesn't belong to the list, Jim came on to debate Tom and wound up looking bad (as in he could only defend himself by repeating 'I've given this to thousands of people and therefor it is safe'). Then there are those like me who go--if I had something really serious I was trying to kill I'd use Jim's (new) protocol--which, by the way, he changed from his original protocol because he finally had to admit, without actually admitting, that he did not understand the chemistry of sodium chlorite, nor what it does in the body, nor how long it is actually IN the body--of a few drops every few hours. BUT--for anything less serious I would certainly use the much safer 5% method the chemist recommends. As he says--it does the same thing as Jim's method, it just takes longer. There are situations where you don't mind it taking longer and then there are situations where you want it to be gone NOW. So I feel there is room for both. Jim, on the other hand, really hates anyone who tries to say his protocols aren't THE end to all illnesses. I've been using MMS since the web first heard about it, as MMS. Sodium chlorite, of course, has been used for decades before Jim brought it to public attention, with his own 'discovered' method. So you pretty much have to read both sides and choose for yourself. Sodium chlorite as MMS has always been a product of extremes. It does one thing for this person and the exact opposite for the next person, in every body response reported from MMS users. I've been on 2 MMS lists (one now defunct) for at least 3 years now and have 'seen it all'. MMS is an amazing thing, but it is MEDICINE, and should be handled with safety. Jim doesn't believe that there is anything at all unsafe about it. I know differently, but Jim refuses to acknowledge that. <shrug> Samala, Renee -------Original Message------- Hi there, I've been seeing this on the MMS list. Project Greenlife are recalling MMS due to FDA 'pressure'/advice. It is on their website http://www.projectgreenlife.com They no longer sell MMS according to their site.
