Well said Sara, I totally agree Debbie
________________________________ From: Sara Mandal-Joy <smjl...@wavewls.com> To: silver-list@eskimo.com; mdev...@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 10:40 PM Subject: Re: Subject: CS>microwave food: hard-boiled vibrations Mike Monet - there is NO place on this forum for YOUR behavior - your accusations of a known and beloved member here. I don't know where owner Mike is at the moment - he'd usually step in when such an egregious accusation was being made. You need to back up though. You may not agree with Marshall - you don't have to, that is your choice. But your accusations are way out of line. There are dynamics going on you have no understanding of, so you accuse Marshall of lies. If you could only see how much your own narrow mind is LYING to YOU..... But whether or not you choose to look at that, it is not accepted behavior on this list to egregiously accuse someone with whom you disagree of lying and faking. Until owner Mike gets back in gear - and I will write him privately, in the case he is just too busy to keep up with the list at the moment - I would encourage all of us to simply block Mike Monet, or at the very least, to no longer respond to him in any way, at least until such time as he shows a willingness to back off his accusational stance. Sara > Marshall<mdud...@king-cart.com> wrote: > >> You are welcome to your opinion. But it is uncalled for to say I have >> faked any data. Nothing could be further from the truth. I may have >> misinterpreted data, misunderstood data, but I have NEVER faked data, >> and never would. I am outraged by your unfounded accusations which have >> no basis in fact at all. Ad hokem attacks are against the ground rules >> here, and totally uncalled for. >> Which unit do you have? They make a number of units. Mine is a Hack DR >> 4000. which cost around $5,000 when I bought it. >> >> Have you even run such experiments with your unit, or are you assuming >> that it would not give similar results and not even running the tests >> similar to what the Catholic Church did when they refused to look >> through Galileo's telescope because they knew it could not be true? >> Marshall > There is no mistake Marshall. What you are doing is deliberate. > > You know how a spectrophotometer works. You have had access to one > long enough. > > The only way you can change the spectrum of distilled water is to > put something in it. Ions, atoms, molecules, or any kind of physical > matter. > > It does not work on thoughts, emotions, prayer, or any non-physical > thing. It does not work on coils of copper wire. > > If you are presenting data and claiming it is the result of these > things, then you are faking the data. > > There is no place in this forum for that behavior. > > Mike Monett > > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org > > Unsubscribe: > <mailto:silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com?subject=unsubscribe> > Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/silver-list@eskimo.com/maillist.html > > Off-Topic discussions:<mailto:silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com> > List Owner: Mike Devour<mailto:mdev...@eskimo.com> > > >
