I have noted a few things about the graph that don't seem quite right. Although the actual graph of ppm starts at 0, the data points extrapolate to about 1 ppm. The fit of the ppm to the data points is extremely poor. The last data point is way off the extrapolation of the other points and appears to be a flyer.
Looking at the data points, instead of the graph of ppm, it seems that we start off with ppm being less than uS, and at about 130 minutes the slope is equal to the uS and after that time the slope is much higher than the uS slope. The implication of this is that small particles are formed initially and larger ones later, which we already know. But even more important is that we cannot use a simple linear relationship between the uS and the ppm, as the ppm goes up, the uS goes up less fast since the particles get bigger. Marshall Hutt William J (Bill) DLPC wrote: > Name: Graph157.gif > Graph157.gif Type: GIF Image (image/gif) > Encoding: base64 -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@id.net>
