----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Duncan Crow 
  To: silver-list@eskimo.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 3:09 PM
  Subject: Re: CS>Friendly bacteria


  Unless you're eating powdered silver, the particles are so small, 
particularly WRT CS, it's all absorbed by your bloodstream before it gets very 
far down your digestive tract. In a dog for example, the CS is detectable 33 
seconds from the time it is infused into the (presumably empty) stomach.
  Whooa ... where are you coming from with this? Like referrences or 
documentation?  Red flags are up here!
  But if you were sick with the 'flu and your system was empty anyway, you 
could control the intestinal portion of the flu by drinking very large 
quantities of CS.  Sheer volume may get it there.
  Flu is divided into different "portions"? Flu is a virus .... period, 
regardless of where it locates in the body and the anti-viral modality of CS 
lies in its smallest particles being able to circumnavigate the immune system 
to reach the virus anywhere and everywhere at the cellular level.
  It's true that silver is ineffective in a nonliquid meduim, but the intestine 
is a primarily liquid medium, that is, it has enough liquid present to produce 
ionic reactions. That's how the bloodstream picks up the silver ions.
  How about sublingual absorbtion?
  But if the chunks were large enough, like powdered silver, the ionic effect 
would continue down inside your bowel until the silver was used up. Which would 
depend on your intestine's PH and any other reactivity. That would correlate 
roughly to powdered silver safely being injected IV in the 1920's.  It will 
eventually dissolve in an acidic environment.
  Wrong!  Blood circulating particles that are too large will deposit them in 
tissues close to the surface of the skin resulting in the infamous 
discoloration of Argyria.  These particles do not "ionize" and disappear. Where 
did you get the information that "powdered silver" was "safely being injected 
intravenously" in the 1920's?  If that indeed happened, I'm sure that ... in 
hindsight .... there had to have been horribly adverse effects!

  fair enough?
  No!  We need to get on the same page!  Where are you getting this information 
from?

  Robert Bartell