In a message dated 8/2/2001 2:30:40 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
> I think not Marshall. Surely most think that ionic silver is more effective > in killing pathogens, or at least don't know which is more effective. > > Just who is the us you refer to... the same 'many' that Frank referred to a > while ago? > > Ivan. > > Ivan: As I recall, Frank believes that ionic silver is an effective germicide for topical applications and lung infections. It's when the infection requires the bloodstream to transport silver that Frank believes ionic silver is ineffective because, according to him, silver chloride will precipitate. I proposed several experiments to begin to explore the validity of his hypothesis. Without experimental studies this debate will go on endlessly. Even some of the "techies" are becoming bored since these discussions are only speculative since no in vivos, CS data is included to back up any particular point of view. Roger
