That's exactly what we're doing here on this list...a shared forum for ideas and experiences. Ken
At 08:48 PM 8/3/01 -0400, you wrote: >> Nearly everyones version of CS is good, some might >> be a little better but no ones is vastly superior >> enough to try and hide the process/content... > >On a pragmatic level, I tend to agree that, really, >all that matters is that CS works, and let's not split >hairs over a good thing. > >But I will say, what if it turned out that by making >CS using a particular method (say, all ionic or all >particulate, high voltage ionic, high voltage >particulate, etc.) we found that we could increase the >level of effectiveness by 10 or 20 times? Continuing >research is, in my mind, a good thing. I do hope it >can be done in a non-competitive spirit and minimize >the response of the ego! > >For average folks who make their own, LVDC is as good >as HV whatever, even if they might need to drink a bit >more. > >Terry > >_______________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.ca address at http://mail.yahoo.ca > > >-- >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > >To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: >[email protected] -or- [email protected] >with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > >To post, address your message to: [email protected] >Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > >
