You match the rate of ion production to the rate of ion hydration by either producing ions very slowly or keeping them stirred up or both. 30 PPM seems to be about the upper limit for stability in storage for LVDC anyhow. Higher colorless concentrations can be made but the odds of the batch turning color increases. If a batch does turn color [agglomerate further into larger particles] the addition of a small amount of hydrogen peroxide will revert it back to colorless but I'm not sure what that actually does. I ran a batch using a few drops of peroxide as a starter and wound up with a very pretty metalflake water. It had no color but did have a million mirrors in it just like one of those snow in a scene souvineers.
The yellow CS probably isn't all one particle size. The paler the yellow, the more of the small ones you'll have. Has anyone thought to incorporate a very small primitive solar generator into the earthenware water purifiers? Not only would that sterilize the water but should also impregnate the earthenware with silver as it is used. BTW copper and zinc ions do much the same thing as silver ions do so far as water purification goes. Would placing a silver spot on one side of the container and a copper or zinc spot on the other make a battery effect that would release metallic ions into the water without using power? Ken At 04:32 PM 9/11/01 +1000, you wrote: >I assume with a statement like that you would have done some >experimentation and are just not going on what everyone else says. Not >being a wise ass. Its just that mine is cloudy when i heat it and yellow or >amber when i don't, so are curious as to how i can change it to be clear. > >Take care >damian >At 05:31 AM 11/09/2001 +0000, you wrote: >>On Tue, 11 Sep 2001 08:08:07 +0600, Reid Harvey >><ceram...@bol-online.com> wrote: >> >> >Also, can anyone indicate what is wrong with yellow CS? >> >>Yellow CS is effective, but not as effective as clear CS having the >>same ppm of silver. >> >> >I'm aware the >> >particles may be a bit larger, but to what bad effect? >> >>No bad effect, but a lesser effect. >> >>Let's say we have two different bottles of CS, one yellow and one >>clear, both measured at 10 ppm. Let's also say that the particles of >>silver in the yellow CS are 10 times the size of the clear CS (yellow >>CS particles could be 100+ times larger than clear CS). >> >>Since the ppm is the same in both, the clear CS will have 10 times the >>number of silver particles as the yellow CS -- making it potentially >>10 times more effective. Also, CS having smaller particles might have >>a better chance of getting into the body (that's conjecture, as I know >>of no research that has tested particle size in the body). >> >> >I believe that we >> >can get CS to a lot more people in the concentrated form, but I'm >> >uncomfortable with the controversy. As dilute CS in bulk it seems too >> >expensive for many. >> >>I don't understand that comment. Dilute CS is easy to make, much >>easier than trying to obtain concentrated "CS." >> >>-- Dean -- from (almost) Des Moines -- KB0ZDF >> >> >>-- >>The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. >> >>To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: >>silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com >>with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. >> >>To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com >>Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html >>List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com> > >
