Evening Roger,
I read the quackwatch article on MSM. I try not to remember anything I
read on quackwatch so as not to
waste brain storage with false information.
My questions is..... Is there ever any truth on quackwatch.
After I first found it, I spent some time doing research on the doctor that
runs it. After doing that, I discounted everything associated with him as
being biases, and virtually false.
Was I wrong in doing this?
The same thing happens to me when doing other research. When I find myself
on a "mainstream medial" site, I get the heck down the road as soon as
possible.
I get a nutrition newsletter that is mainstream backed. I did research on
the doctors involved, and generally find it worthless and filled with half
truths.
Now I know I am biased as to information source. Possibly I am
wrong. Still, we have been fed so many lies all of our lives, we want
only truth or honest mistakes.
Like our friend Charlton Heston described the president....... he stated,
When you tell us something that is wrong, and you did not know the facts
were false, that is a mistake.
But.... when you tell us something that you know is wrong..... that is a lie.
Possibly I am confused, but only a little bit.
Wayne
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
[email protected] -or- [email protected]
with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
