A short while back I saw where someone was haveing a bad problem with alergies all of a suden he would take Cs and as soon as he stopped it was back. He found out where he worked there was a leaky water problem and where it was was being picked up in air conditioning or air filtering and spread through that system. I The water problem in the place was fixed after the EPA got into it and his alergiy prob;em left him. Sometimes in our homes there is musty or mold someplace and or something else that causes persisitant problems. A person should check this out when taking something like CS and when stopping taking it your problem is back right away. I know if I walk into a must oder older house I can end up in hospital. Maxine I know -----Original Message----- From: Arnold Beland <abel...@tampabay.rr.com> To: silver-list@eskimo.com <silver-list@eskimo.com> Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 6:52 AM Subject: Re: CS>Re[2]: CS>CS, Current, water, etc. was Testers
>Solar, > Thank you for posting the link to this: >http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/99feb/germs.htm >It was this Atlantic Monthly article that gave the impetuous for me to start >making my own CS. I had been buying CS for some years as a prophylactic for >recurring severe sinus infections that would incapacitate me for days at a >time. > If you have any more links, especially about bacterial and viral >"loading" please post them. > >Thanks Again, > >Arnold > >----- Original Message ----- > >> I highly urge everyone to go read this article, in full! It can be >> viewed at..... >> http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/99feb/germs.htm >> >> >> AJ> Cancer is negatively charged. So how is the particle >> AJ> silver going to effect the cancer? >> >> Are you assuming that CS ONLY works by the charge it carries? If so, >> please cite your references. >> >> >> >> AJ> The silver particle supporters talk about ionic silver as if it's a >done >> AJ> deal that all ionic silver is converted to silver chloride in the >body. >> AJ> They are the ONLY ones to do so. I've never met a silver particle >supporter >> AJ> / ant-ion promoter ( exclusively silver particles ) that either didn't >have >> AJ> a financial interest, or were parroting those who do have a financial >> AJ> interest. >> >> The above statement is incorrect. Even Frank Key himself DOES NOT >> discount the benefits of ionic silver! If you would like, I can direct >> you to his website so that you can read this firsthand. The only >> statement Frank makes is that HE BELIEVES that when CS is INGESTED, >> only the particles make it into the bloodstream. This is not the pro >> particle/anti ion argument that you make it sound like. On his website >> he clearly states conditions that he feels ions would be preferable to >> particles. >> >> AJ> Furthermore, while there is some anecdotal evidence to suggest that >> AJ> colloidal silver can have an impact on cancer, there is also anecdotal >> AJ> evidence that suggests it does not. This likely means that in some >> AJ> situations CS use can work, and in others, it doesn't. This suggests >that >> AJ> colloidal silver use is an excellent ADDITION to a full natural ( >and/or >> AJ> allopathic ) treatment protocol. >> >> I totally agree with the above statement. >> >> AJ> No matter how hard I try, I can't see particle silver doing much for >cancer. >> AJ> I can't identify a method of action. I've seen situations where a >> AJ> negatively charged substance has impacted cancer, but it was a GREAT >deal >> AJ> more of the substance, to the point where there is a generation of an >> AJ> electromagnetic field, to do so. HOWEVER, I could be wrong. I'd be >more >> AJ> than open to hearing a theory on particle silver action on tumors. My >own >> AJ> research into cancer and silver has just begun. >> >> Just because a method of action can't be identified doesn't mean that >> something isn't taking place. >> >> AJ> My single point is that you don't have to rely exclusively on one side >or >> AJ> the other. Until clinical evidence demonstrates facts, all the >chemistry >> AJ> theories in the world mean little more than a starting place for >study. >> >> AJ> Science has not changed that much, in its method of operation, over >the last >> AJ> few hundred years... Remember, at one time, scientists first looked >through >> AJ> a microscope and announced to the world that they SAW a little person >in >> AJ> sperm. >> >> AJ> I plan, hopefully within the foreseeable future, to enlist the >assistance of >> AJ> a nonbiased organic chemist to fully address the issue, or at least >make the >> AJ> best attempt to do so. >> >> AJ> But you should know: it has been proven that ionic silver CAN plate >onto >> AJ> organs. This is an undisputed fact, documented by Petering in the >70's ( I >> AJ> have not seen the actual studies ), who was considered a reputable >> AJ> scientist. While this was demonstrated by the use of ionic silver >> AJ> compounds, it was still ionic silver. If the ionic silver was >converted to >> AJ> silver chloride or other compound, no organ plating would be >possible - at >> AJ> least, that is my thinking on the subject. SO, the ionic silver made >it >> AJ> through the stomach/or/bloodstream, to the organ, at which time, for >> AJ> whatever reason, it was still ionic. Then, it plated onto the organ. >> >> I would have to see the study. Besides, there is a great difference >> between ingesting silver ions in water at a very low concentration, >> and massive amounts of, say, silver nitrate. While he may have >> documented this, what was the concentration of silver required to do >> this (in milligrams per kilogram of body weight)? >> >> AJ> Anyone truly honest would say: We don't know. There is not enough >> AJ> evidence. >> >> AGREED!!!!!!! >> >> Anyhow, this is NOT meant as a pissing contest! I have just added my >> views, and made a slight correction to the ion/particle statement. >> >> Everyone is invited to join in, in a CIVILIZED mannor please! >> >> Regards, >> Solar >> >> >> -- >> The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. >> >> To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: >> silver-list-requ...@eskimo.com -or- silver-digest-requ...@eskimo.com >> with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. >> >> To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com >> Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html >> List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com> >> >
