List,
I find some useful info. and links on Quackwatch, but the flaws and biases are just grotesque. Among other outrages, you can find a listing of Omura's brilliant, patented Bi-Digital O-Ring Test as an "unnatural method," and a wholesale dismissal of the German-made EAV-type diagnotstic machines and methodology. A review of one such machine is illustrative: the reviewer had no operating manual and had no idea of how the machine was supposed to be used; the reviewer mistakenly believed that a glass vial -- containing nothing -- was supposed to cause a deflection in the ohm-meter on the machine, and suggested the failure of an empty glass vial to do so indicated the falseness of the entire concept. This is just awful. An essentialpart of EAV diagnosis is based on molecular (or sub-molecular) resonance. No one has ever claimed that an empty glass vial would produce changes in an EAV or Vegatest reading. I know only a very little about this field, but I can certainly recognize grotesque bias and unfairness when I see it. Quackwatch certainly demonstrated a very wrongheaded, misleading, and inaccurate approach to EAV. Read Barret's final words in this section of the website to understand his prejudice: he says that anyone who uses such methods is either deluded or incompetent or criminal, and urges readers to report anyone who uses such devices to him and to other agencies that can carry out criminal prosecution. Barrett seems to want to be expert, judge, prosecutor, and jury all at the same time. I was really disturbed by this bullying and antagnoistic approach. All the same, I have gotten so much useful info. and so many good links that I think Quackwatch deserves at least grudging respect as a source of information, along with the disinformation. Formats such as this one can help us to distinguish between the two. JBB Duncan Crow wrote: > > Steve Barrett is a nobody who is attempting to discredit a two-time Nobel > laureate and his decades of research by shabby sniping consisting of a > poorly thought out armchair outburst of "hooey" that he only hopes the > uninfomed public will swallow because of the sheer size of his website. > Smacks of penis envy. More on Setve and his organisation's antics on > www.savedrclark.org > > What the self-proclaimed "expert" (he has been denied expert status in > court) shovels as truth leaves out the meat of the argument. As Otto Warburg > proved, to get his two Nobel prizes for precisely this research, anaerobic > fermentation of cells will result in cancer. Reversing this process is > accomplished by thousands of M.D.s in clinical settings all over the world. > It works, and it works reliably, despite Steve's desperate bleatings. > > If indeed Mr. Barrett understands the process at all, he deliberately > misrepresents it as he does many other, practically all other, modalities on > the quackwatch site, including many others that produce stellar results.. > > OK here's the lowdown: > > Although tissues are bathed in oxygenated blood, it's the process of > absorbing the oxygen through the cell wall that is impaired in a cancer > situation. Oxygen does not diffuse in, it must be carried, so of course the > petri dish argument of it being exposed to room oxygen is out too. > > If the cell membrane voltage drops too low, there's not enough voltage > difference between the outside and inside of the cell to facilitate easy > exchange of the oxygen and other nutrients with the waste inside the cell. > As Otto Warburg pointed out, ANYTHING that interferes with cell respiration > i.e. anything that encumbers the respiration by dropping membrane voltage, > will result in a lack of oxygenation. This anything can be toxins within or > without the cell, and also can be body pH, which if low, results in systemic > oxygen shortages. > > As an aside, membrane voltage can be at least temporarily restored through > some of the electronic and magnetic frequency devices, and in practice this > has been proven out (Priore, Rife), allowing the cell to respire normally > again, chuck the toxins, and absorb oxygen. I know about the infection > connection, but that does not explain the success obtained by either > zapping, or the Beck blood electrification, neither of which kill systemic > bacteria. The blood electrifier's effectiveness on bugs is within the > bloodstream only, and the zapper's power is much too low to produce voltages > needed to kill things in the body. > > However it starts, lowered cellular oxygen disables the natural DNA repair > mechanism that every cell contains. Without this natural DNA repair > mechanism, all aerobic life would have cancer and the species would not > survive. The lowering of oxygen to 40% of optimal will not kill the cell > outright because the cell has the ability to survive by fermenting sugar > anaerobically rather than burning both sugar and fat aerobically. If the DNA > breaks, from free radicals produced, you have cancer. Raise the > intracellular oxygen levels somehow, and the DNA repair functions again and > the cancer starts to shrink as cells are normalized. > > Restore cell membrane voltage potential and cell respiration is done in > several ways; Hans Neiper uses cal/mag/potassium to force an effect by > raising extracellular pH, which allows more oxygen to be carried through the > lymph to the cells, and the alkaline mineral also favourably influences the > difference between inside and outside voltage of the cell, which facilitates > oxygen and wast exchange. We already practice this as a preventive. Recent > studies for example prove that colon cancer statistics are dramatically > reduced by adding calcium supplements to the diet. And many of us are > proactively monitoring saliva pH. > > As an aside, The sugar connection is being used as we speak; inducing > hypoglycemic shock through dietary mods, and then inulin injections, is > being used to kill cancer cells outright. Another way this is being used is > dietary mods and a substance that prevents the liver from producing sugar so > all it can produce is oils, which normal cells can live on and cancer cells > can not. > > Sure there are more arguments on the valididy, but not today > > ciao > > Duncan > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > [email protected] -or- [email protected] > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
