Dear Chuck,
Just for the record, the dog involved in this procedure was a
stage IV cancer victim......this ancillary
protocol was one---among several----of our "last-ditch" efforts to save
her. It was not an "experiment".
Sincerely, Brooks Bradley.
cking...@nycap.rr.com wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 17:20:53 +0000, "M. G. Devour" <mdev...@eskimo.com> wrote:
>
> >Anybody have a link handy for Brooks Bradley's group's studies of blood
> >levels vs. time for dogs... and something else that led to the great
> >Gatorade experiment?
> >
> >Mike D.
>
> Does this help?
> Chuck
> "More hay, Trigger?" "No thanks, Roy, I'm stuffed!"
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> For those contemplating the use of CS in an
> enema-type protocol, a consideration might be in order. We found,
> several years ago, during some absorption evalutions involving dogs and
> human volunteers.....that the addition of 5% to 10% DMSO proved to be
> of pronounced assistance in accelerating the CS absorption;
> particularly so in the lower colon. Additionally, we found the use of
> "so-called" clustered/micro-crystal (distilled prior to orientation), to
> be immensely helpful for achieving desireable results. While several
> different methods were employed to achieve "crystal-like orientation",
> the use of a simple funnel having two small ceramic magnets ( (+) facing
> on one and (-) facing on the other) taped to the lower throat section
> (and generating a clock-wise vortex while pouring).....to furnish about
> 80% of the effectivity of systems costing hundreds of dollars. Even
> just "one-pass" availed increases of 75% in dyne number
> increases......in some cases.
> CAUTION: For experimenters considering the use of
> H202.....even at 3%; there is some element of risk involved----- most
> especially if a "high colonic" type of enema irrigation is
> contemplated. We, almost, killed a dog during such an
> evaluation.....through the generation of a pressure-block which occurred
> when the original liquid insertion navigated past a hard-stool section
> and generated a foam-filled pressure-front. Only a very quick
> "bloat-relief" (mechanically generated) type protocol saved the animal
> from suffocation......as he suffered immediate, life-thereatening,
> pulmonary distress from the gas-distension insult. The use of H202 for
> such a protocol IS NOT recommended for the untrained non-professional.
> This is, simply, our considered opinion. While the odds may not be high
> for such an occurrence, they certainly exist----especially in the
> presence of an extensive, quantitative, anaerobic field.
> Sincerely, Brooks Bradley
>
> --
> The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
>
> To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
>
> Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
>
> List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
