I had thought that this particular thread was over. Since it's come up again I'd like to point out that this site isn't Quackwatch, although it has a link to it. Nor do I (as some of the replies implied) support or defend QW in any way. When I suggested that some people here might like to look at it, what I expected were one or two comments from people more knowledgable than I on the subject of water magnets, prills etc making some sort of rebuttal to the points that are made at this site. Rod
----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 4:55 PM Subject: Re: CS>SFU site In a message dated 8/1/2002 8:55:31 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes: <<Catherine, I can appreciate your mistrust of all things Quackwatchy, but I think suggesting that people might not want to listen to an informed POV, even one that you or I might not agree with... is a mistake.>> Quack Watch, the guy who heads it is a bit of a nut. He took Mercola.com to court over some stupid thing and he is enraged, i guess, that anyone could find a solution outside of the medical community.
