Jason wrote: > > I always enjoy revisiting particulate silver. > > Francis, we've established the basis of your theories, once again, and > revisited the ole silver chloride issue; the thorn in ionic silver's back, > so to speak. > > I'm interested in knowing your opinion, and the basis thereof, on how much > more effective you believe Mesosilver to be than an above average "ionic" > silver -- say ASAP or SilverKare or even Colloid Australia? > > If you have a product that is 10PPM @ 90% ionic, meaning there would be > about 1 PPM silver particles, do you believe your product would be 3X more > effective? 8X more effective? > > Second, I am curious how you explain, and your feelings concerning, Brooks > Bradley's report which indicated an equal effectiveness of your colloidal > silver and Natural Immunogenics... given Brooks' level of integrity and > certainly a great deal of commitment to unbiased research?
It is our belief that the effectiveness is predicated on "particle surface area". In this context, effectiveness is defined as the colloid's ability to interact with its environment. Particle surface area increases as: * particle concentration goes up * particle size goes down You can find references in Ronald Gibbs book pertaining to particle surface area that confirms what is stated above. Comparing results from various products can get quite difficult to quantify. While the theory is solid, it is not clear to me the extent to which results have a linear relationship to increasing particle surface area. The relationship may be non-linear and dependent on individual physiology. frank key -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
