Ode Coyote modified my silverpuppy to make gallon batches.  Stir is by heat
plate supplied by him,  getting 16 ppm with auto shutoff.  Light straw
color, barely perceptible tyndall..
Very happy, thanks silverpuppy.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Monett" <ncrffn...@sneakemail.com>
To: <silver-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 1:42 PM
Subject: CS> Maibox Replies #1


> To List,
>
> Well, I appreciate the opportunity to help people who email me with
> questions, but it is starting to take too much time, and probably the
> questions should be posted to the list so others have a chance to
> comment.
>
> From now on, I will post any email I get regarding cs, but remove the
> sender's full name or any personal information that may cause
> embarrassement.
>
> Here's one that asks my opinion on two commercial cs generators:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>   > Hi Mike:
>
>   > I am a lurker on the silver list and barely understand  what ya'll
>   > are talking about.
>
>   > I am about to get my first generator and have it down to  two, the
>   > silverpuppy and  the silvergen ....the $99.00 deals.  For  one who
>   > cannot program a VCR what would you suggest?
>
>   > Also, I  cannot find anywhere that tells me the shelf life  of CS.
>   > If I have the Silverpuppy what would the shelf life be? I  plan on
>   > using the  CS  for  my   family   and  Labradors  (5)  and BullDog
>   > (1)...especially for the dogs drinking water.
>
>   > Thank you for your time.
>
>   > Sincerely,
>
>   > Becky
>
>   Hi Becky,
>
>   Thanks for the email. I have not used either model, but from  what I
>   can glean from their web sites, I'd go with the silverpuppy.
>
>   Here's why:
>
>   SilverPuppy
>   -----------
>
>   http://www.silverpuppy.com/current%20controlled%20CS%20generator.html
>
>     "2] Uses 7" looped electrodes in a configuration that  presents no
>     edges to  the water for excellent  edge  discharge characteristics
>     and greater surface area. [Electrodes are twice the length  as the
>     ones for  the  old "Standard Series 1" generator,  12  gauge .999+
>     pure silver] Surface area of 12 gauge wire is exactly the  same as
>     one side of a 1/4 " flat ribbon of the same length.  Total surface
>     area for  7"  =  3.2  sq   "  submerged  with  no  edges  to erode
>     prematurely."
>
>     "Wire is  stronger, easier to handle, mount and swap from  side to
>     side for  even wear. 1/4" x .13" flat silver is extremly  flimsy ,
>     hard to  keep flat and parallel, and most of the ion  discharge is
>     from the  side  facing the other electrode. Ion  Discharge  from 6
>     edges and  4  corners  makes a flat  electrode  erode  into  a "V"
>     shape."
>
>     "3] Makes  Colloidal  Silver faster and better  than  the  old non
>     stirred "Standard" model."
>
>   Discard the hype about faster and better. Everyone makes that claim.
>
>   I agree that 12 ga wire is stronger, easier to clean, and  easier to
>   handle. It  makes  no difference in swapping from  side  to  side to
>   equalize wear as they claim.
>
>   The 3.2  square inches is a generous amount of wetted area.  Just to
>   check their  calculation, if the electrodes are 7  inches  long, the
>   total length  of wire is 14 inches. 12 ga wire is  0.25  square inch
>   per inch, so 14 inches of wire has an area of 3.5 square inches, not
>   counting the bend at the bottom.
>
>   So, their calculation is reasonable and probably correct.
>
>   Also, this  unit comes with a thermal stirrer which  some  say helps
>   produce better quality. I have not been able to confirm this with my
>   own tests, but it might be a useful feature to have.
>
>   Finally, it comes completely assembled and ready for use.
>
>   Silvergen
>   ---------
>
>   I can't  find any Silvergen model at $99. If you mean  the  SG5A, it
>   seems to be $119, which is $20 higher than the SilverPuppy.
>
>   http://www.silvergen.com/General/technica.htm
>
>     "Our electrodes are .25 inches wide and .013 inches thick. If they
>     are submersed 4 inches, the total surface area will be 4.21 square
>     inches. This  is  2.5 times the wetted surface  area  of  14 gauge
>     wires. Therefore the current density of 14 gauge wires will be 2.5
>     times higher  than the electrodes we use. What this means  is, the
>     amount of  silver released using our electrodes will be  so spread
>     out over the surface of the electrodes, it will be releasing  at a
>     slower pace. If the silver is released more slowly,  the particles
>     are smaller. They will also be more uniform in size because of the
>     constant current  regulator  and stirring. The  result  is  a more
>     uniform, small particle size colloid."
>
>   A 0.013  flat ribbon will be difficult to keep straight.  This means
>   it will be difficult to keep a uniform electrode spacing from top to
>   bottom.
>
>   While a  small  variation  probably   doesn't  matter,  you  will be
>   constantly fussing  with  it and wondering if  it  is  affecting the
>   results. It is not worth the hassle.
>
>   I'd go with 12 ga. wire. It is much stronger and will eliminate this
>   area of concern.
>
>   They claim an area of 4.21 square inches. I don't see where they get
>   the extra  0.21  square inches, unless they  are  counting  the edge
>   effect. This is actually a bad thing, since it increases the current
>   density and  leads  to  larger  particles.  Round  wire  has uniform
>   current density.
>
>   The area  calculation is wrong. 4 inches of 0.25" wide  material has
>   an area  of  1 square inch. I'm not sure they can  assume  the other
>   side has  equal current distribution, but if it does,  the  total is
>   only 2 square inches.
>
>   If they  are  adding the anode and cathode together to  arrive  at a
>   total, they  are  deceiving you. The current  density  is calculated
>   using either electrode, not both.
>
>   Their information is wrong and very deceiving.
>
>   http://www.silvergen.com/
>
>     "SG5A and  SG5B are the original models we brought  to  the market
>     years ago.  They use the same constant current  internal regulator
>     as the  SG6  but do not have auto shut-off,  a  stirring  motor or
>     variable PPM  control. They use external electrodes.  This colloid
>     generator comes  with a four page instruction sheet,  3  foot long
>     electrode lead, 2 - 1/4" wide, 5" long .999 pure silver electrodes
>     and operates off standard 120 volt wall current. The  hi intensity
>     light emitting  diode  (LED) indicator serves  triple  purpose. It
>     indicates power ON/OFF when the unit is first turned on.  When the
>     cable is  inserted into the jack and the electrodes are  placed in
>     the water it then acts as a water quality indicator. If  the light
>     comes on  when the electrodes are first inserted  into  the water,
>     the water is not good. It has minerals in it which will hinder the
>     process. With "good" water, once the process has started,  the LED
>     then acts as a current flow indicator."
>
>   The water  quality indicator shuts the system off if  it  thinks the
>   water is no good.
>
>   This prevents you from seeding a new batch with some from a previous
>   run. So you cannot speed the process if your distilled water is very
>   good quality.
>
>     "SG5A inside  view. This generator uses the same  constant current
>     regulator as the SG6 but does not have automatic shutoff, variable
>     PPM control  or the stirring motor. You run the unit  for  a given
>     time to produce the strength in PPM you desire. It can make  CS up
>     to 15  PPM  with  no color. Higher  concentrations  can  produce a
>     yellow color  CS because of agglomeration. This unit  is identical
>     to the  SG5B but can not work with external DC voltages from  9 to
>     40 volts as the SG5B can."
>
>   Although the  cheaper  model has no stirring  motor,  I  think their
>   approach to  mount the unit on top of the water container  is  a bit
>   risky. I'd be concerned about it tipping over and spilling water all
>   over the  place. You do not need water spills  where  electricity is
>   involved. Also, the unit may fall to the floor and be damaged.
>
>   The overall design of the Silvergen is not as carefully  thought out
>   as the  SilverPuppy. The price is $20 higher. You  have  to assemble
>   the unit. The flat strips will be impossible to keep straight. Their
>   calculations on electrode surface area are wrong and deceiving.
>
>   I'd go with the SilverPuppy.
>
>   But I'd  be concerned about supplying 5 Labradors,  a  BullDog, plus
>   your family from a single unit.
>
>   If the  dogs are not sick, perhaps they don't need any.  Your family
>   is most important, but you didn't say how many people. If you have a
>   large family and everyone gets the flu at the same time, your little
>   generator will be working constantly. I'd try to keep a  reserve for
>   situations like this.
>
>   Properly prepared  cs has no reason to degrade. If  it  turns yellow
>   and plates  out,  it was prepared with too high a  current.  You can
>   solve this by running at a lower current, but it will take longer.
>
>   Hope this helps!
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Mike Monett
>
>
> --
> The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
>
> To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
>
> Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
>
> List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
>