Mike,
Thanks for making a substantial contribution to the art.  Your results
using very low current densities and a long "brew" time parallel my
own.  I, however,
make a gallon at a time using currant limiting with as much as 1500
volts.  I can't see why the "potential gradient" can have any effect
on the end result.  I'm not saying it doesn't, I just don't see why it
should.  What am I missing here?
Arnold

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Monett" <fcue0n...@sneakemail.com>
To: <silver-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 10:58 PM
Subject: CS>Re: $$$ perpectives


> url: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m59996.html
> CS>Re: $$$ perpectives
> From: jrowland
> Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 22:09:51
>
>   >> ...at the  cathode,  which  is the  location  where  misting
will
>   >> start...
>
>   > By the term "misting", are you inferring silver is being drawn
off
>   > the cathode; the negative electrode?
>
>   > jr
>
>   Hi jr,
>
>   No, I  do not mean to imply silver is being drawn from  the
cathode.
>   My theory  is  the silver ions form an invisible  cloud  around
both
>   electrodes.
>
>   At the anode, they have just left and are slowly moving  towards
the
>   cathode. When they reach the cathode, they form another  cloud
since
>   hydrogen is  also  formed  at the cathode,  and  there  are  no
more
>   electrons available to interact with.
>
>   The density  of these clouds is directly related to the  current
and
>   voltage across the cell.
>
>   At the  anode,  high current means a higher density of  ions  in
the
>   immediate vicinity of the electrode. This increases the  chance
that
>   Brownian motion will push ions together until they get  close
enough
>   for the van Der Walls effect to make them stick.
>
>   Note the  term "Brownian motion" is not exactly correct,  but  it
is
>   good enough  for  our  purposes. Similarly, there  are  a  number
of
>   effects that  together form the van Der Walls force,  and  which
one
>   operates depends  on the type of ion. It is OK to use van  Der
Walls
>   to describe any of these effects since they are all lumped
together.
>
>   The same  effect occurs at the cathode. When the ion cloud  is
dense
>   enough, the particles become large enough to see, and form a mist.
>
>   Usually, the  mist  first starts forming at  the  cathode.  With
low
>   current, round wires and no stirring, it forms a uniform cloud
about
>   1/16" thick around the wire.
>
>   The cloud is denser than the surrounding water, so it  begins
slowly
>   falling to the bottom of the glass. It may form a stream and  go
out
>   at right angles to the rod, then disperse.
>
>   The mist  starts forming at the anode after it has already  begun
at
>   the cathode.  I  believe the reason for this is  the  field
gradient
>   moves the  ions away from the anode and towards the cathode,  so
the
>   density is greater at the cathode.
>
>   The proof  is to reverse the voltage applied to the rods.  The
cloud
>   that formed  around the cathode disperses quickly without  forming
a
>   stream. It simply disappears.
>
>   I believe  stirring has the same effect. The  particles  still
form,
>   but they  are  quickly dispersed. I believe this  is  why  the
three
>   methods of stirring I tried produced cs that was not very
effective.
>
>   Running at  very low current reduces the density of  the  ion
cloud.
>   This reduces  the number of ions that are pushed  together,  and
the
>   mist doesn't form until you reach very high concentrations.
>
>   This stuff  is  unsuitable  for  drinking -  it  has  a  very
strong
>   metallic taste  and gives me an upset stomach. But it is OK  to
hold
>   in the mouth for ten minutes, then spit out.
>
>   My current  approach  is to run 6 hrs at 335 uA  with  3.85  sq.
in.
>   wetted area and 425 ml of dw. This produces 7.24 Coulombs and 19
ppm
>   calculated. The current density is 87 uA/sq. in.
>
>   The rods  stay clean with only a trace of black stuff  after
wiping.
>   The salt test is quite strong.
>
>   You can  definitely tell it is having an effect after holding  it
in
>   the mouth.  Just  run your tongue along your  teeth  afterwards.
The
>   teeth feel  slightly rough and bits of tartar may fall off  over
the
>   next few days. You may find small cavities you never knew about.
>
>   But if you have a sore throat from a flu just starting, it will be
gone
>   the next day.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Mike Monett
>
>
> --
> The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal
silver.
>
> Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at:
http://silverlist.org
>
> To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
>
> Silver-list archive:
http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
>
> List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>