Supplement with cranberry juice. Marshall
Smith, Michael wrote: > Yes Rob - It's Gonorrhea.Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Combis [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 2:30 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: CS>CS and H202 - CS and stabilised oxygen? > > Michael-If you don't mind can you let us know where the > bacterial infection is?? This may help explain why it is > only keeping the infection at bay. I would look at including > Grapefruit seed extract into your regimen to complement your > CS intake. It is also a strong, natural > anti-bacterial.... RC > > -----Original Message----- > From: Smith, Michael > [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Mon 10/20/2003 9:02 AM > To: '[email protected]' > Cc: > Subject: RE: CS>CS and H202 - CS and stabilised > oxygen? > Well first of all there is the sheer volume of > water. I personally do not > want to spend all day drinking litres and litres > of water and then having to > run to the toilet to pee 37 times a day! > > Secondly - Ronald J. Gibbs studied the efficacy of > colloidal silver against > bacteria,(which is of relevance to my current > infection) and concluded that > a minimum of 9 parts colloidal silver to 1 part > bacteria-laden water is > required for colloidal silver to be effective in > reducing the bacteria > colony count to one. He further concluded that a > 20:1 ratio provided optimum > efficacy. Any concentration less than 9 parts CS > to 1 part bacteria-laden > water and the bacteria colony would not be killed > off totally and would then > start to multiply again. So what I conclude from > this in my current > situation is that my 2 litres a day of 10ppm CS > for the last two + weeks > which has done nothing but keep the infection > where it is is not enough to > totally destroy the infection. So the way I see it > is that I can drink CS > with a higher ppm (of course the best quality, > smallest particles, > completely clear) OR I can drink more volume of > the same CS. > I would rather drink CS with a higher ppm at the > same volume because: > > 1: Too much volume of water is uncomfortable for > me > > 2: The lower ppm CS may not be enough to reduce > the bacterial colony > sufficiently > > 3: Not enough CS may be reaching the the infected > area anyway so possibly > drinking a higher pppm CS would get enough down > there to do the job. > > This is just my view based on what I am > experiencing and what I have read. > I'm not saying anything is better than anything > else - I am just trying to > come to an informed solution to my problem. > > regards > > Mike > > > -----Original Message----- > From: George [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 9:05 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: CS>CS and H202 - CS and stabilised > oxygen? > > > The only thing you are drinking more of is ... > water. The amount of silver > (in this hypothetical example) would be > roughly the same. Why are you assuming that 10 > ppm is in any way "lesser" > than 20 ppm except in the gross > amount of silver present? The ppm value is only a > ratio of silver to water. > > Regards, > George > > On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 09:19:05 +0100, Smith, Michael > wrote: > > >I'm sorry but I don't agree. I'd rather drink 2 > litres of a stronger > product > >than 4 litres of a lesser product. > > > >regards > > > >Mike > > > > > > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for > discussion of colloidal silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: > http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: > [email protected] > > Silver-list archive: > http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > > > ===================================== > > Disclaimer > > This e-mail and any attachment may contain > confidential and privileged > information and is intended for the attention and > use of the addressees > only. If you are not the named recipient, please > notify the sender > immediately, destroy the message from your system > and do not disclose the > contents to another person, or use it for any > purposes, store or copy the > information in any medium. > > The sender of this message shall be neither > responsible nor liable for any > errors or omissions in the content of this message > as secure or error free > e-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed. > Information could be intercepted, > corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or > incomplete or contain viruses. > > If verification is needed, please ask for a hard > copy or check otherwise. > > ===================================== > > > > > > ===================================== > > Disclaimer > > This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged > information and is intended for the attention and use of the > addressees only. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the > sender immediately, destroy the message from your system and do not > disclose the contents to another person, or use it for any purposes, > store or copy the information in any medium. > > The sender of this message shall be neither responsible nor liable for > any errors or omissions in the content of this message as secure or > error free e-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed. Information could > be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete > or contain viruses. > > If verification is needed, please ask for a hard copy or check > otherwise. > > ===================================== >
