Excellent reference. I have the book, but had completely forgotten about
that part.

Marshall

Trem wrote:

> Hi Sandy,
>
> We have had customers use CS to get rid of tumors and metastasized
> cancer with excellent results.  I hadn't been able to determine why
> until I ran across the following excerpts in Dr. Becker's books.
>
> As a side note, he published his results and then his grants were
> stopped and not renewed so he could no longer continue with his work.
>
> Trem
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> The Body Electric Chapter 8 Page 178
>
> At this time, therefore, I must conclude that high-current electrodes
> might enhance the growth of any preexisting tumor cells in the
> electrical path—unlike low-current silver, which when negative had no
> effect on, and when positive suspended mitosis of cancer cells in our
> lab.
>
> Page 224 The Body Electric
>
> In my group's experiments with human fibrosarcoma cells in vitro,
> negative and positive currents both speeded up growth by over 300
> percent. On the other hand, as mentioned in Chapter 8, we found that
> we could suspend mitosis in the fibrosarcoma cells with silver ions
> injected by minute levels of positive current. During one day of
> exposure, the cells appeared to dedifferentiate completely, and they
> stopped dividing for a month without additional treatment, even though
> we changed the nutrient medium regularly. Obviously, this entire
> subject needs to be investigated more thoroughly.
>
> Pages 164-166 cross currents
>
> By Dr. Robert O. Becker
>
> "In each case, the nonunions healed even faster than they would have
> if negative electrical currents had been used. In addition, the soft
> tissues and skin healed at the same extraordinary rate. The
> electrically generated silver ion was doing something more than
> killing bacteria—it was also causing major growth stimulation of
> tissues in the wound.
>
> When we finally tracked down exactly what was happening, we found that
> as human fibroblast cells (which are common throughout the body) were
> exposed to the electrically generated silver ions, they
> dedifferentiated. They were then able to multiply at a great rate,
> producing large numbers of primitive, embryonic cells in the wound
> even in patients over fifty years of age. These "uncommitted" cells
> were then able to differentiate into whatever cell types were needed
> to heal the wound. So what we were in fact doing was turning on
> regeneration in human tissues, which I had thought we would never be
> able to do.
>
> In our previous studies of regeneration, we had found that in human
> beings, only bone-marrow cells could dedifferentiate. Because there
> were so few such cells, we thought that any regeneration in human
> beings (other than fracture healing) was impossible. The
> dedifferentiation of the abundant fibroblast cells by electrically
> generated silver ions may provide us with the means to restore
> regeneration to human patients.
>
> While I was excited at this serendipitous discovery, my patients could
> have cared less how the wounds were healed. They were simply delighted
> at the fact that, at long last, a treatment had worked. Perhaps the
> most important moral in this story is that it demonstrates that no one
> can tell in advance what will happen in a scientific experiment.
>
>                electrochemical therapy for cancer
>
> Actually, this circuitous pathway led us back to one of our original
> aims, the control of cancer growth. If the electrically generated
> silver ion dedifferentiated normal human fibroblast cells, would it
> also dedifferentiate human cancer cells? If so, we would have a way to
> duplicate in human beings Dr. S. Meryl Rose's experiments with
> salamander cancers, in which dedifferentiated cancer cells
> redifferentiated as normal cells. A lack of funds, unfortunately,
> prevented us from completing this work. However, we did find that some
> human cancer cells in culture appeared to dedifferentiate when exposed
> to these silver ions.
>
> I also had a patient with a severe, chronic bone infection who had an
> associated cancer in the wound. He refused amputation, which would
> have been the treatment of choice, and insisted that I treat his
> infection with the silver technique. After three months, the infection
> was under control, and the cancer cells in the wound appeared to have
> changed back to normal. When I last heard from him, eight years after
> the treatment, he was still fine.
>
> It is important to realize that this is not simply an electrical
> effect, but the result of the combined action of the electrical
> voltage and the electrically generated silver ions. It is an
> electrochemical treatment. While we do not have firm evidence at this
> time, what probably happens is that the silver ion is shaped so as to
> connect with some receptor group on the surface of the cancer-cell
> membrane. After that connection is made, an electrical-charge transfer
> sends a signal to the nucleus of the cancer cell that activates the
> primitive-type genes, and the cell dedifferentiates. In that state it
> awaits instructions as to what it is to become. The process is exactly
> the same as that in Rose's experiments, except that in this case the
> dedifferentiation is caused by the unexpected action of the positive
> silver ions.
>
> This technique obviously requires more study before any clinical use
> can be made of its antitumor effect. However, it does appear to be a
> promising lead in an otherwise rather grim picture."
>
>
>
>      ----- Original Message -----
>      From: Sandy . Green
>      To: silver-list@eskimo.com
>      Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 2:31 PM
>      Subject: [silver_list] CS>sick friend with metastases
>       I have a very sick friend who has cancer which has
>      metastasized to
>      her brain from her lungs and now there is a tumor growing on
>      her
>      thigh. She is a fighter and doing various cleanses, using my
>      ozone
>      sauna, homeopathics and supplements. I now want to introduce
>      her to
>      cs which I make myself, but I can't find any reference
>      anywhere to
>      support this. I've seen so many bacteria and viruses as well
>      as
>      illnesses, positively connected to cs, but not cancer. I
>      know this
>      is a hot topic and "they" are watching.....
>
>      I'm hoping that those of you who are able to advise me, will
>      email me
>      privately if this can't be discussed on list.
>
>      Thank you
>
>      Sandy
>
>      -------------------------------------------------------------
>      Do you Yahoo!?
>      Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
>